Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+Nichrome\s+Wire\s+for\s+Parasitic\s+Suppressors\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+Nichrome\s+Wire\s+for\s+Parasitic\s+Suppressors\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Re: Nichrome Wire for Parasitic Suppressors (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 13:36:16 -0700; Interesting, Dan. I will share this info with the AMPS group. I used the same technique, without the globars, in the 8169 Ugly amplifier that is on my Web site. The trouble with globars is that they; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00134.html (8,639 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Re: Nichrome Wire for Parasitic Suppressors (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 10:16:53 -0700; Agreed, , Dan. However, for the optimal suppressor -- to maximize stagger-tuning -- the L-supp needs much more L than R-supp. // According to Terman's ''Radio Handbook'', doubling the width of a con; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00153.html (9,527 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]