Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+Our\s+CB\s+Brethren\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+Our\s+CB\s+Brethren\!\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Re: Our CB Brethren! (score: 1): Author: odin@webspan.net (Steve Bermudez); Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 14:57:36 -0400; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0069_01BF1654.73C02760 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All, I've been watch; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00458.html (14,563 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Re: Our CB Brethren! (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 14 Oct 99 14:27:08 -0500; I don't either. But as far as I say, let them continue to use 10KV, 15KV, 20KV, etc on their tubes. The X-ray emmission will eventually fry them and Darwins principle of natural selection will work i; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00461.html (8,518 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Re: Our CB Brethren! (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 10:41:21 -1000; It would appear they have a bang up good time at their gatherings; the whole family seems to join in, unlike some or ours. That seems to be their purpose, just having fun, I guess. Ever see a couple; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00466.html (8,240 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Re: Our CB Brethren! (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 14 Oct 99 16:08:05 -0500; Well, we engage in tug of wars on AMPS everyday! And while gunny sacks might not be the right terms, there are plent of sacks of other stuff floated around here sometimes! 73, Jon KE9NA -- The Second; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00467.html (8,274 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Re: Our CB Brethren! (score: 1): Author: kc4slk@csrlink.net (kc4slk); Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 17:35:59 -0400; We certainly have our share of campfires with lots of "flames" to fan. ...-.- Mike W3SLK -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00471.html (9,432 bytes)
6. [AMPS] Re: Our CB Brethren! (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements); Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 20:04:58 -0500; The web site forgot to mention the prize money that changes hands at one of these meets. Thousands of dollars change hands in one afternoon. Unlike amateur radio, these guys are also in it for the mo; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00478.html (9,535 bytes)
7. [AMPS] Re: Our CB Brethren! (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 07:41:16 -0400; A little like the "normal" use of the nitro motors they use to generate the power in the first place! Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00488.html (8,733 bytes)
8. [AMPS] Re: Our CB Brethren! (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Fri, 15 Oct 99 08:43:11 -0500; Well for that matter, why don't they just use big dummy loads then to key into instead of antennas? That way, it's legal then and they aren't interfering with anyone else. I'd have no problem with th; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00494.html (8,673 bytes)
9. [AMPS] Re: Our CB Brethren! (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements); Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 08:52:38 -0500; This is electronic arm wrestling, Jon. The antenna is a part of the system and they often fail from the power applied. The winner is determined on field strength meters... not watt meters. Phil, K5PC; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00496.html (9,549 bytes)
10. [AMPS] Re: Our CB Brethren! (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 09:55:01 -0700; Have you ever seen a termination that will handle 800k? - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Admini; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00501.html (8,717 bytes)
11. [AMPS] Re: Our CB Brethren! (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Fri, 15 Oct 99 14:33:03 -0500; I didn't know these guys were running 800K. I thought it was 80k. That's what was reported. You could easily make one that handles 80K. I can even provide the terminations (at a price or course) as o; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00508.html (8,903 bytes)
12. [AMPS] Re: Our CB Brethren! (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements); Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 15:01:04 -0500; I The name of the game is ERP. They care not about how many watts they can make, but what the F.S. meter says accross the field. The antenna design is an important part of the system. It must be inst; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00509.html (8,810 bytes)
13. [AMPS] Re: Our CB Brethren! (score: 1): Author: johnf@futurenet.co.za (John Fielding); Date: Sat, 16 Oct 1999 19:02:38 +0200; Yep, plenty used at Marconi Communications in Chelmsford where they made the high power AM broadcast transmitters. Ask Peter G3RZP. I visited there once whilst they were testing a 1,5MW AM transmitte; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00518.html (9,016 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]