Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Reading\s+Reflected\s+and\s+True\s+$\?$\s+Power\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Reading\s+Reflected\s+and\s+True\s+$\?$\s+Power\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Reading Reflected and True (?) Power (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Fri, 1 Oct 99 09:35:33 -0500; Jim, Thanks for all your experiments. It is enlightening to see what happens. As to why your matched antenna with the tuner requires less drive power than the dummy load, I have no idea! I would thin; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00012.html (8,960 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Reading Reflected and True (?) Power (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 16:55:39 -1000; Hi again, to continue: Jon replied: Well, today I proceeded with more care. Borrowed another Bird 43 from KH6FMT, who must have purchased it close to 45 years ago! It certainly looks it, S/N 15794; m; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00039.html (8,799 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Reading Reflected and True (?) Power (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 14:50:44 -1000; Aloha, Following my confession/ignorance in not retuning my amp during the tests yesterday, Jon wrote, in part: Per this point.... Rcv'd a very nice note from Bruce Knox, W8GN of RF Applications, bui; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00003.html (15,073 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Reading Reflected and True (?) Power (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 11:08:58 -1000; Aloha, and to continue: Yes, true; however......... have now removed the tuner and the Hofi switch from the set up, and the result is.... the true behavior of my particular C4 at 28055, where I find; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00322.html (11,640 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Reading Reflected and True (?) Power (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Wed, 29 Sep 99 16:44:51 -0500; WOW! You are asking some tough questions here! First of all, indicated forward power is likely to be the SUM of the forward and reflected power. One way to check is to tune the amp into your antenna.; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00323.html (9,925 bytes)
6. [AMPS] Reading Reflected and True (?) Power (score: 1): Author: watson@epiloglaser.com (George K. Watson); Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 16:09:37 -0600; you have some loss in your long run of coax, you can compensate inside the shack. And some folks over-compensate, and some have really really long, lossy runs of coax (really!, honest!). George K. Wa; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00326.html (8,466 bytes)
7. [AMPS] Reading Reflected and True (?) Power (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 03:21:22 -0700; ? Did he ask questions, Jon? - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQ; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00328.html (8,474 bytes)
8. [AMPS] Reading Reflected and True (?) Power (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 13:37:31 -1000; some stuff and some questions.. Rich asked: Yes, at least three of them: 1. Is the operation as I described legal? Or, how much power is actually being radiated, about 1500 watts or about 1800 watts; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00330.html (9,325 bytes)
9. [AMPS] Reading Reflected and True (?) Power (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 13:41:28 -1000; Oops, forgot one question within: some stuff and some questions.. 4. How much power is the linear actually generating? About 1500 or about 1800 watts? 73, Jim, KH7M PS: My belief is about 1500 watts.; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00331.html (8,484 bytes)
10. [AMPS] Reading Reflected and True (?) Power (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 06:18:30 -0700; ? I agree. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.co; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00335.html (8,591 bytes)
11. [AMPS] Reading Reflected and True (?) Power (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 15:54:14 -1000; Ok, 1.8 kW indicated into 2.3:1 vswr impedance load, with 300 or so reflected was previous data. Now, because of some strange behavior by the P-3000 gadget, have decided to switch to Bird instruments; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00337.html (12,785 bytes)
12. [AMPS] Reading Reflected and True (?) Power (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 23:26:34 -0500; 1500 Watts. The power meter in reading total power is reading effectively the sum of forward and reflected power. 73, Jon KE9NA -- Jon Ogden KE9NA http://www.qsl.net/ke9na <-- CHECK IT OUT! It's been; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00339.html (8,944 bytes)
13. [AMPS] Reading Reflected and True (?) Power (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 23:31:00 -0500; I have to think a little about your statements. While I don't doubt your experimental results, I would have thought that you would not see that variance in drive power. Of course, one has to start th; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00340.html (9,406 bytes)
14. [AMPS] Reading Reflected and True (?) Power (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 07:53:22 -1000; More fiddling will follow, hi. I have just, early this morning been reading in Walter Maxwell's book, "Reflections". In Chapter 7, section 7.5 he discusses what is required to match a mismatched ant; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00343.html (10,019 bytes)
15. [AMPS] Reading Reflected and True (?) Power (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 30 Sep 99 15:48:05 -0500; OK! Now it makes sense. Yeah, you gotta retune for different loads. There will be SOME variation because as others point out, the SWR meter is really designed to optimally work in a relatively 50 Ohm; /archives//html/Amps/1999-09/msg00348.html (10,224 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]