Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+S\s+units\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+S\s+units\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] S units (score: 1): Author: wc6w@juno.com (Radio WC6W); Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 17:40:26 EDT; For what it is worth... here are this morning's measurements, in the S unit department, made on my well aged Kenwood TS-440, with a HP8640B source. I didn't measure S1 as this is almost the resting p; /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00224.html (7,963 bytes)
2. [AMPS] S units (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 09:13:55 -0400; About 3-4 dB is more common than about six dB, so your Kenwood looks good. Now for something to think about. One of the question for getting a license is how many dB is an S unit. No where, in any re; /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00237.html (8,208 bytes)
3. [AMPS] S units (score: 1): Author: johnf@futurenet.co.za (John Fielding); Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 18:33:47 +0200; If i remember correctly (Peter G3RZP will probably corect me anyway) it was Roly Shears G8KW - who founded KW Electronics -that proposed that S9 be set at 50uV and that each S unit would be 6dB. For; /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00248.html (9,387 bytes)
4. [AMPS] S units (score: 1): Author: wc6w@juno.com (Radio WC6W); Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 18:18:39 EDT; On Tue, 13 Jul 1999 09:13:55 -0400 "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> writes: If not good, at least typical. My ARRL Handbooks from 1976 thru 1990 mention the 6dB grail in the discussion under S-Meter; /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00261.html (8,834 bytes)
5. [AMPS] S units (score: 1): Author: michon@eatel.net (Mike Michon); Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 18:21:17 -0700; When first getting on 160 meters I was trying to figure out how to give a report on CW with the S meter reading from S8 to20 over with the crashes. The copy was miserable R3/ R2. So the report is ???; /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00262.html (10,957 bytes)
6. [AMPS] S units (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 07:47:59 +0100; Devices (AD8307; it truly accurate Only if it's hooked in outside the AGC loop. Steve -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: am; /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00272.html (7,637 bytes)
7. [AMPS] S units (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 09:53:38 +0100; I believe the S9 = 50 microvolts predates KW Electronics by a long time. In any case, it wasn't unknown for S meters there to be 'calibrated' so that they read in accordance with a subjective assessm; /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00275.html (8,164 bytes)
8. [AMPS] S units (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 11:03:10 -0400; In my receiver that is in front of the major selectivity, and even the mixer. But I believe the AD8307 could be used if "wrapped-around" the entire IF stages and used to supply AGC. While a large ch; /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00282.html (8,043 bytes)
9. [AMPS] S units (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 16:33:31 +0100; Sure could, but see US Patent US5159280 73 Peter G3RZP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Probl; /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00285.html (7,693 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]