Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+SB\-220\s+IMPROVEMENTS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+SB\-220\s+IMPROVEMENTS\s*$/: 35 ]

Total 35 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] SB-220 IMPROVEMENTS (score: 1): Author: w5hvv@aeneas.net (Roderick M. Fitz-Randolph); Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 07:00:40 +0000; <<Snip>> <<snip>> == I've seen the time that I would kill for another dB or two!! Rod, W5HVV -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative reque; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00001.html (7,840 bytes)
2. [AMPS] SB-220 IMPROVEMENTS (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 12:35:46; And when you consider that the *net* gain from a good tribander is only 5 dB or so over a dipole at the same height, that 10 dB looks better and better. 73, Pete Smith N4ZR n4zr@contesting.com -- FAQ; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00005.html (8,321 bytes)
3. [AMPS] SB-220 IMPROVEMENTS (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Tue, 1 Apr 97 07:25:11 -0800; Two db on moonbounce is worth having. Two db on 75m is not. An old timer, W6SDM, once told me that if you want to build a sudsier SSB amplifier, it takes close to ten db more pep output to make the; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00009.html (8,906 bytes)
4. [AMPS] SB-220 IMPROVEMENTS (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 12:14:31 EST; Maybe not if you are up in the ding-a-ling part of the band. Down in the part of the bands where "real men" operate, 2dB can make the difference between busting a pileup or playing with yourself. The; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00016.html (8,401 bytes)
5. [AMPS] SB-220 IMPROVEMENTS (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Tue, 1 Apr 97 11:56:09 -0800; Granted, wasting time in DX mutt-piles probably would cut down a bit on onanism, Carl--although I wouldn't be surprised to learn that some guys have mastered doing both simultaneously. . It seems to; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00018.html (9,652 bytes)
6. [AMPS] SB-220 IMPROVEMENTS (score: 1): Author: wrt@eskimo.com (Bill Turner); Date: Wed, 02 Apr 1997 01:42:08 GMT; On Tue, 1 Apr 97 11:56:09 -0800, Rich Measures <measures@vc.net> wrote: <snip> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> I always though it would be cool to have my call on my tombstone.; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00022.html (9,184 bytes)
7. [AMPS] SB-220 IMPROVEMENTS (score: 1): Author: wa2moe@doitnow.com (wa2moe@doitnow.com); Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 18:52:00 -0700; yes...Don Miller's wife...with his call -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00023.html (8,750 bytes)
8. [AMPS] SB-220 IMPROVEMENTS (score: 1): Author: dbr@alumni.caltech.edu (David B. Ritchie); Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 18:50:25 -0800 (PST); 3db is barely detectable by the human ear 1-2 db can be measured by expensive instruments 2db hardly seems useful on any band (of course, the first 160db may be VERY useful) Dave N7UE David B. Ritchi; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00027.html (9,542 bytes)
9. [AMPS] SB-220 IMPROVEMENTS (score: 1): Author: dbr@alumni.caltech.edu (David B. Ritchie); Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 19:03:16 -0800 (PST); I still can't stop laughing! You better make sure that you can live with (die with?) the phoenics that people will come up with! Dave N7UE (I hate to think!) David B. Ritchie, Esq. D'Alessandro & Rit; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00028.html (10,314 bytes)
10. [AMPS] SB-220 IMPROVEMENTS (score: 1): Author: dbr@alumni.caltech.edu (David B. Ritchie); Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 19:03:58 -0800 (PST); Details??? It sounds juicy Dave N7UE David B. Ritchie, Esq. D'Alessandro & Ritchie, P.C. -- Intellectual Property Lawyers 3521 E. Yorkshire Road, Pasadena, CA 91107-5432 818-683-8800 (TEL) 818-683-89; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00029.html (9,383 bytes)
11. [AMPS] SB-220 IMPROVEMENTS (score: 1): Author: bscott@thor.pla-net.net (Bob Scott); Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 21:18:25 -0600; So here lies Dave, N7UE, Keyed down his amp, The coax was damp, And poor Dave went kablooey! ** Address: bscott@pla-net.net Web site: http://www.pla-net.net/~bscott/index.html Name: Bob Scott Amateu; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00030.html (9,084 bytes)
12. [AMPS] SB-220 IMPROVEMENTS (score: 1): Author: w5hvv@aeneas.net (Roderick M. Fitz-Randolph); Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 04:08:27 +0000; == Dave, what you say is absolutely true regards audio: 1 dB is the smallest amount of increase that can be detected with the ear. However, in regard RF, it is my belief that you are way off base. W; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00031.html (9,439 bytes)
13. [AMPS] SB-220 IMPROVEMENTS (score: 1): Author: n7us@mci2000.com (Jim & Line' McDonald); Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 22:11:08 -0700; Actually, I do. My good friend, N7RR, died in about 1983, and his widow, Lisa, sent me a picture of the tombstone she had made. It had a windmill style tower with yagi and his call vertically on the; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00034.html (9,971 bytes)
14. [AMPS] SB-220 IMPROVEMENTS (score: 1): Author: robrk@fyi.net (Bob Morris K2RK); Date: Wed, 02 Apr 1997 00:31:54 -0500; I'll bet Bruce, in Bellevue WA, would like a copy of the photo... -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contestin; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00036.html (10,540 bytes)
15. [AMPS] SB-220 IMPROVEMENTS (score: 1): Author: dbr@alumni.caltech.edu (David B. Ritchie); Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 23:50:49 -0800 (PST); Whatever you say -- but when you are at a noise floor (like the moonbounce example) -- I find it hard to believe that 1db will do you much good -- what does that make your S/N ratio at that point? An; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00038.html (10,439 bytes)
16. [AMPS] SB-220 IMPROVEMENTS (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Wed, 02 Apr 1997 11:17:17 EST; I certainly do not know what your operating preferences are Dave but by your comments I would assume (very bad choice of words to a lawyer, I know) that casual operating predominates. I am talking fr; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00042.html (10,745 bytes)
17. [AMPS] SB-220 IMPROVEMENTS (score: 1): Author: dbr@alumni.caltech.edu (David B. Ritchie); Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 09:03:02 -0800 (PST); OK I wouldn't say I am a casual user, but on the other hand, I've never gone to a lot of trouble to actually measure the signal strengths -- I consider the S-meter pretty useless for measuring these; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00045.html (13,572 bytes)
18. [AMPS] SB-220 IMPROVEMENTS (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Wed, 02 Apr 1997 14:51:07 EST; Good Lord, I cant believe an Extra Class ham would even make that statement in private! Please, Dave, do a bit of homework. Also consider checking into the 20M EME net or even joining the VHF Weak Si; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00047.html (8,563 bytes)
19. [AMPS] SB-220 IMPROVEMENTS (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Wed, 02 Apr 1997 16:03:04 EST; You measure it right at the speaker terminals Dave. The Simpson 260 or Tripplett 630 have good audio response at 1000Hz (I dont know what the limits are). Set the range for a low range AC scale (0-2.; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00052.html (10,061 bytes)
20. [AMPS] SB-220 IMPROVEMENTS (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 3 Apr 97 02:10:15 -0800; What matters is how many db you are above the noise to start with. If the noise is S-1 and your signal is S-8, you are 7*6db= 42db above the noise floor. Adding 10db is a waste of energy. However, i; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00057.html (8,531 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]