Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+SB1000\s+parasite\s+question\s+for\s+Tom\s+and\s+Rich\+\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] SB1000 parasite question for Tom and Rich+ (score: 1)
Author: N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 18:57:28 EDT
<< The fix that seems to work is: reduce VHF amplification. >> Rich it seems to me that one way to reduce vhf gain would be not to use tubes ( very expensive ones) that have max. ratings to 500 mhz o
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00066.html (8,270 bytes)

2. [AMPS] SB1000 parasite question for Tom and Rich+ (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 18:52:35 -0700
True enough, Hank. The 3-500Z apparently oscillates c. 150MHz in the SB-1000, so tube choice is less limited than one might think. . . According to unsubstantiated rumour, the 8877 can oscillate fro
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00070.html (9,168 bytes)

3. [AMPS] SB1000 parasite question for Tom and Rich+ (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 22:12:00 -0400
Hi Hank, How do all those big fancy amplifiers with lighthouse tubes or big tubes in cavities with extreme Q's not oscillate? Actually that is exactly backwards. The most stable HF amplifiers use tu
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00071.html (9,494 bytes)

4. [AMPS] SB1000 parasite question for Tom and Rich+ (score: 1)
Author: N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 00:32:20 EDT
<< The LEAST stable amplifiers use tubes that marginally work at 30 MHz, like 811A's or 572B's. >> Answer me this, since I am in the process of renovating a 30l-1 using 811-A's should I expect this a
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00073.html (8,941 bytes)

5. [AMPS] SB1000 parasite question for Tom and Rich+ (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 22:03:08 -0700
A fellow who works for Hughes assured me that they do. Hughes builds a 100kW HF amplifier that uses six antiparasitic devices. I know of an 8877 amp that has an incredible track record. I have teste
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00075.html (11,583 bytes)

6. [AMPS] SB1000 parasite question for Tom and Rich+ (score: 1)
Author: ITR@Nanoteq.co.za (Ian Roberts)
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2000 10:13:25 +0200
Sound practice! 1. Use power device with lowest transfer frequency to achieve the power required. 2. Pay utmost attention to isolating the input from the output. 3. Pay utmost attention to RF bypass
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00076.html (9,576 bytes)

7. [AMPS] SB1000 parasite question for Tom and Rich+ (score: 1)
Author: rfamps@ic24.net (Steve Thompson)
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 08:08:50 +0100
Hank, An important factor (maybe the most important factor) in whether a g-g amp is stable is whether the grid is at rf ground. Once it is not, feedback increases and instability becomes more likely.
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00077.html (10,047 bytes)

8. [AMPS] SB1000 parasite question for Tom and Rich+ (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it)
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 10:37:44 +0200
RF design is not such a complicate matter, in theory, what's difficult is to deal with and to realize objects that doesn't introduce too many unknown parasitic parameters so modifying, in practice, t
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00081.html (12,856 bytes)

9. [AMPS] SB1000 parasite question for Tom and Rich+ (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 08:52:47 -0400
Actually not. The maximum usable frequency of the device has nothing to do with stability. It isn't difficult to understand what the problem is. The problem is at some frequency the grid no longer f
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00082.html (11,978 bytes)

10. [AMPS] SB1000 parasite question for Tom and Rich+ (score: 1)
Author: da_kang@hotmail.com (Jeff Wolf)
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2000 13:45:57 GMT
Actually not. The maximum usable frequency of the device has nothing to do with stability. Tom, So what you are saying is that a 3-500Z will oscillate at 1 ghz just as well as a 2c39? Seems that wha
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00083.html (10,349 bytes)

11. [AMPS] SB1000 parasite question for Tom and Rich+ (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 10:32:23 -0400
No, if I wanted to say that I would have said that. What I said was the fact the tube has useable gain at a high frequency has no direct relationship to instability. As a matter of fact the most sta
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00084.html (11,285 bytes)

12. [AMPS] SB1000 parasite question for Tom and Rich+ (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 07:37:22 -0700
tubes ? Mr. Rauch's statement about grid-resonance is the way it is. When the supposedly grounded grid is resonant, Pandorra's Box is undoubtedly open. ? The source of the VHF seed-voltage is the an
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00086.html (11,372 bytes)

13. [AMPS] SB1000 parasite question for Tom and Rich+ (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 07:37:24 -0700
? Well put. ? true ? Good point. cheers, Mauri - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00088.html (11,214 bytes)

14. [AMPS] SB1000 parasite question for Tom and Rich+ (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 07:46:28 -0700
[chortle] - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00089.html (9,989 bytes)

15. [AMPS] SB1000 parasite question for Tom and Rich+ (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 08:19:18 -0700
Arcs that leave no internal marks. . . . Should a big-bang in a vacuum be heard? An amplifier is normally heavily loaded at the operating frequency. If an amplifier has an intermittent VHF parasitic
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00090.html (12,046 bytes)

16. [AMPS] SB1000 parasite question for Tom and Rich+ (score: 1)
Author: phil@vaxxine.com (Phil (VA3UX))
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2000 21:31:15 -0400
If "tinks" in a vacuum can be heard (ie. de-wiskering a vacuum cap), then big bangs in a vacuum should also be heard. Phil -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesti
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00101.html (9,847 bytes)

17. [AMPS] SB1000 parasite question for Tom and Rich+ (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 21:45:34 -0400
Actually all the banging and tinking you hear from the tube are conducted through the elements to the envelope and then to the air. That isn't the bulk of the noise you hear. The bulk of the noise i
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00102.html (10,529 bytes)

18. [AMPS] SB1000 parasite question for Tom and Rich+ (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 20:46:44 -0700
? Rich did not write the following sentence. I wrote the following: vac. cap. tinks can barely be heard. Big bangs are loud. The accompanying flash comes from the HV circuitry. cheers, Phil - Rich..
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00103.html (9,839 bytes)

19. [AMPS] SB1000 parasite question for Tom and Rich+ (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 20:46:43 -0700
? (key word) ? [chortle] ? other things? ? Oscar Meyer. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Admini
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00105.html (10,705 bytes)

20. [AMPS] SB1000 parasite question for Tom and Rich+ (score: 1)
Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements)
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2000 09:11:50 -0500
vac. cap. tinks can barely be heard. Big bangs are loud. The accompanying flash comes from the HV circuitry. The tink can barely be heard because it is a current limited arc. Does anyone care to sac
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00117.html (10,422 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu