Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+SS750\s+20\s+meter\s+test\s+and\s+\(maybe\)\s+explanation\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] SS750 20 meter test and (maybe) explanation (score: 1)
Author: rakefet@rakefet.com (Vic Rosenthal)
Date: Mon, 08 May 2000 19:38:50 -0700
Here are the results of testing the SS750 (8 x 2SC2879) on 14 MHz. including collector currents. Someone also asked what the bias voltage is; it is +0.66 volts on all the modules. Testing was into a
/archives//html/Amps/2000-05/msg00113.html (9,319 bytes)

2. [AMPS] SS750 20 meter test and (maybe) explanation (score: 1)
Author: RMcGraw@blomand.net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX)
Date: Mon, 08 May 2000 22:13:24 -0500
For what it's worth. I've looked at the figures regarding input vs. output. The amp seems to be providing some degree of compression in the form of non-linearity in as much as the input to output gai
/archives//html/Amps/2000-05/msg00114.html (11,434 bytes)

3. [AMPS] SS750 20 meter test and (maybe) explanation (score: 1)
Author: rfamps@ic24.net (Steve Thompson)
Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 08:06:20 +0100
including +0.66 1.1:1. Looking at the gain and efficiency figures, it is behaving normally for an amp where the collector load impedance is too high. watts amps! the Yep - although it's not just the
/archives//html/Amps/2000-05/msg00117.html (10,788 bytes)

4. [AMPS] SS750 20 meter test and (maybe) explanation (score: 1)
Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements)
Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 09:35:49 -0500
To be perfectly fair to Henry, the first page in the manual has always stated that the CW output is 500 watts.. The SS-750 puts out more power than Ten-Tec, Metron, and SGC. All it needs is SWR prot
/archives//html/Amps/2000-05/msg00119.html (8,815 bytes)

5. [AMPS] SS750 20 meter test and (maybe) explanation (score: 1)
Author: rakefet@rakefet.com (Vic Rosenthal)
Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 07:57:00 -0700
I don't know if this means anything, but a check of the impedance looking into the coax feeding my antenna (which seems to work much better with the amp than the dummy load) with an ancient Millen an
/archives//html/Amps/2000-05/msg00120.html (9,480 bytes)

6. [AMPS] SS750 20 meter test and (maybe) explanation (score: 1)
Author: rakefet@rakefet.com (Vic Rosenthal)
Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 08:14:17 -0700
I am not sorry I bought this amplifier; it has a very good cooling system and will probably prove to be quite reliable. I chose it over the TenTec (etc.) because it appeared to be conservative in des
/archives//html/Amps/2000-05/msg00121.html (8,546 bytes)

7. [AMPS] SS750 20 meter test and (maybe) explanation (score: 1)
Author: rfamps@ic24.net (Steve Thompson)
Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 08:25:44 +0100
other the finished stated that At least they are meting the claimed spec. - my comment was meant as a sweeping generalisation, rather than a dig at Henry. I'm always disappointed that, with SSB the d
/archives//html/Amps/2000-05/msg00128.html (9,022 bytes)

8. [AMPS] SS750 20 meter test and (maybe) explanation (score: 1)
Author: rfamps@ic24.net (Steve Thompson)
Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 08:28:21 +0100
--Original Message-- From: Vic Rosenthal <rakefet@rakefet.com> To: Steve Thompson <rfamps@ic24.net> Cc: Amps reflector <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 09 May 2000 15:54 Subject:
/archives//html/Amps/2000-05/msg00129.html (8,808 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu