Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+SV\:\s+G2DAF\s+and\s+super\s+cathode\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] SV: G2DAF and super cathode (score: 1)
Author: sm5ki@algonet.se (sm5ki)
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 22:09:34 +0000
-- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.con
/archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00195.html (10,268 bytes)

2. [AMPS] SV: G2DAF and super cathode (score: 1)
Author: k7fm@teleport.com (Lamb)
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 16:52:51 -0800
One significant factor regarding the G2DAF is the time delay on the screen voltage. If the dc created by the rectified rf charges a capacitor in the screen circuit and that charging causes a delay in
/archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00197.html (7,974 bytes)

3. [AMPS] SV: G2DAF and super cathode (score: 1)
Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures)
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 20:04:56 -0700
? This is the tip of the iceberg. What about the seriously non-linear relationship between screen potential and peak anode current?. If this is the case, there can be no grid/screen amplification. A
/archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00199.html (8,516 bytes)

4. [AMPS] SV: G2DAF and super cathode (score: 1)
Author: k7fm@teleport.com (Lamb)
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 22:03:05 -0800
I did not say that RCA recommended the G2DAF circuit. What I did say was that RCA published and recommended a circuit where the screen was not regulated. It simply means that a blanket statement that
/archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00202.html (8,560 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu