Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Stainless\s+Steel\s+Chassis\s+Effects\?\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Stainless\s+Steel\s+Chassis\s+Effects\?\?\?\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Stainless Steel Chassis Effects???? (score: 1): Author: bakerhouse@uswest.net (Mike Baker); Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 00:06:56 -0700; OK gang, here is a passing thought for you all to ponder. Amazing what my mind can come up with when I am tired. I read recently where Ameritron is now using stainless steel for the chassis of some o; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00528.html (8,355 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Stainless Steel Chassis Effects???? (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 07:31:16 -0500; Hi Mike, 1.) The surface area of the chassis is so large conductivity is high no matter what material is used. 2.) Virtually none of the stainless steel is in the RF path anyway, it is just the box t; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00533.html (7,865 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Stainless Steel Chassis Effects???? (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 06:51:56 -0600; I've heard of people using stainless steel before. When I had a resonance problem due to cavity effects in my amp, several people suggested using a stainless steel lid (the problem came into play whe; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00534.html (7,886 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]