Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Suppress\s+the\s+Suppressors\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Suppress\s+the\s+Suppressors\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Suppress the Suppressors (score: 1): Author: k7fm@teleport.com (Lamb); Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 12:50:37 -0700; I do not wish to impede the quest for knowledge, nor the exercise of clear thinking - or even unclear thinking, but it seems we have had a never-ending debate about parasitic suppression. So, I wish; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00130.html (8,472 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Suppress the Suppressors (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 14:55:59 -0700; ? rubbish. Nothing was heard until October, 1988 *QST* Magazine. Which contact burned? Were you present when the contact burned? /// The above story seems unlikely because tank potential is maximal; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00132.html (8,854 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Suppress the Suppressors (score: 1): Author: k7fm@teleport.com (Lamb); Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 21:08:45 -0700; "Which contact burned? Were you present when the contact burned? /// The above story seems unlikely because tank potential is maximal only when the tank is nearly resonant. As soon as the band switch; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00137.html (7,887 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Suppress the Suppressors (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 22:18:20 -0700; I doubt it. Hams tend to blame themselves for component failures. My guess is that either the 10m L contact was burned or the 80m Load padder contact was burned. Do you recall which contact was burn; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00138.html (8,473 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Suppress the Suppressors (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements); Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 01:17:59 -0500; My guess is that the switch contact burned/arced before it ever LEFT the position it was in. One usually does not jerk a tune C around, so the hand movement was probably slower and less forceful tha; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00140.html (8,507 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]