Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+TL\-922\s+limitations\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+TL\-922\s+limitations\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] TL-922 limitations (score: 1): Author: w4nul@brightok.net (Robert L. Willsey); Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 21:44:26 +0000; Mike, Would you please let me know what fan you used to replace the stock tl-922 one? If you could tell me where you got it and the part number I would really bless you!! I have had to modify my amp; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00131.html (6,991 bytes)
2. [AMPS] TL-922 limitations (score: 1): Author: k7fr@concord.televar.com (Gary Nieborsky); Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 07:52:21 -0800 (PST); Assembled Gurus: What is the limiting factor in a TL-922 amp that prevents one from using CW in the SSB position??? Transformer rating? Tube rating? Misc. other components? Thanks. Gary K7FR -- FAQ o; /archives//html/Amps/1997-02/msg00012.html (6,861 bytes)
3. [AMPS] TL-922 limitations (score: 1): Author: mikemr@nwlink.com (Michael Mraz); Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 16:23:57 -0000; I always ran my TL-922 in the SSB position. Higher plate voltage gives the same power output at lower plate current. I only used the CW position for initial tune-up. I never had any problem with the; /archives//html/Amps/1997-02/msg00014.html (7,600 bytes)
4. [AMPS] TL-922 limitations (score: 1): Author: mai@iquest.net (Patrick Croft); Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 12:25:03 -0500 (EST); Gary, Mike's comments point to the limiting factor you asked for - the unit isn't built to 2KW OUTPUT spec's. The unit may be ran at the higher voltage at reduced current limit. The duty cycle of CW; /archives//html/Amps/1997-02/msg00015.html (7,913 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]