Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+The\s+3CX3000\s+\-\s+Why\s+not\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+The\s+3CX3000\s+\-\s+Why\s+not\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] The 3CX3000 - Why not? (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 13:19:58 -0500; Ok...my curiosity got the better of me and looked up the specs on the 3CX3000 tube. Here is the question. Give price and performance...why is the tube ignored by the major makers of ham radio amps? S; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00325.html (7,711 bytes)
2. [AMPS] The 3CX3000 - Why not? (score: 1): Author: blckhole@ripco.com (Keith Morehouse - W9RM); Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 14:15:00 -0500; Isn't a 3CX3000 what Henry puts in the 8K ?? --##-- PROBE ELECTRONICS 100 Higgins Road, Park Ridge IL 60068 USA Keith J. Morehouse / W9RM / Society of Midwest Contesters 847-696-2828 FAX: 847-698-204; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00328.html (7,424 bytes)
3. [AMPS] The 3CX3000 - Why not? (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@connect.net (Phil Clements); Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 16:25:54 -0500; That is what Henry USED to put in their 8K-Ultra. They have pulled it off the market due to chronic RF tank circuit problems. What you have to remember on using these big tubes is that the blower req; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00335.html (7,397 bytes)
4. [AMPS] The 3CX3000 - Why not? (score: 1): Author: jhenders@ZIANET.COM (Jim Henderson); Date: Wed, 23 Apr 1997 08:47:12 -0600; The 8160's anode cooler design is so efficient that MMMM, with a filament running 94 to 104 amps at 7.5v, I can see why people are warming up to these tubes...... Jim, KF7E Jim Henderson jhenders@zia; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00346.html (7,235 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]