Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+a\s+sticky\s+issue\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+a\s+sticky\s+issue\.\s*$/: 58 ]

Total 58 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] a sticky issue. (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 09:24:04 -0700; AMPS members -- Will requested that I telephone him yesterday afternoon regarding ad hominems. As we were talking, his computer was apparently downloading a flood of mail from bellyachers / lap dogs; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00279.html (8,271 bytes)
2. [AMPS] a sticky issue. (score: 1): Author: rakefet@rakefet.com (Vic Rosenthal); Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 10:41:39 -0700; Yes. Just talk about technical issues. Not about motives, character, personal habits, veracity, etc. How can this be so hard? 73, Vic, K2VCO Fresno CA -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amp; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00284.html (7,669 bytes)
3. [AMPS] a sticky issue. (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 11:48:00 -0700; Nothing is more important than veracity. For example, Gore's stupid exaggerations may cost him the presidential election. Torpedoing technoblatherers consumes way less time when they loose it. For m; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00288.html (8,354 bytes)
4. [AMPS] a sticky issue. (score: 1): Author: baycock@HIWAAY.NET (Bill Aycock); Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 14:58:41 -0500; Rich- Try the egroups.com site- they will let you set up a list for only the price of a few ads. It is funny that your own personality, not any "Rauchian" group is the real problem- you cant imagine; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00290.html (9,783 bytes)
5. [AMPS] a sticky issue. (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 20:01:44 -0700; another mailing won't work, Bill. See below for explanation. According to Wes, the copper-wire suppressor had an Rp of 166-ohms at 100MHz and the resistance-wire suppressor had an Rp of 101-ohms. Mo; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00292.html (10,869 bytes)
6. [AMPS] a sticky issue. (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 00:14:51 -0700; During the grate debate, Tom's faithful lapdogs attacked my 1/1994 QST article, The Nearly Perfect Amplifier and stated that a rheostat simply will not work for adjusting filament potential (sic). o; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00294.html (10,291 bytes)
7. [AMPS] a sticky issue. (score: 1): Author: Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope); Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 08:50:44 -0700; Rich, Seems that issue is not that effective resistivity of nichrome increases with decreasing frequency - I don't think anybody is arguing that. What is evident is that the effective series resistan; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00302.html (12,580 bytes)
8. [AMPS] a sticky issue. (score: 1): Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara); Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 19:14:37 +0200; The impedance of an inductor with a resistance in series, is equivalent to another inductor with a certain resistance in parallel. This is easily demonstrable by impedance series parallel transformat; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00305.html (10,783 bytes)
9. [AMPS] a sticky issue. (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 14:45:18 -0400; The AL80B becomes unstable, with no suppressor, at around 180 MHz or so depending on the tube socket and lead length. Suppressor operation at 150-200 MHz is all that matters in that case. The Measur; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00310.html (10,035 bytes)
10. [AMPS] a sticky issue. (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 14:45:19 -0400; What Mauri says is true, Rich for some reason always overlooks that point. The suppressor impedance required varies with layout, and can range from no suppressor at all to a suppressor with very hig; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00311.html (9,158 bytes)
11. [AMPS] a sticky issue. (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 12:18:30 -0700; Mr. Rauch has. He has also argued that most of current flows in the resistor instead of the inductor. In the 28-November sample problem he proposed, slightly more than half of the current flowed thr; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00313.html (13,748 bytes)
12. [AMPS] a sticky issue. (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 16:51:24 -0400; It would be best to look carefully at what was actually said, than what Measures "claims" was said. You'll see large differences, as he lifts things from context and changes facts. Adding any HF los; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00314.html (9,811 bytes)
13. [AMPS] a sticky issue. (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 19:32:22 -0700; Here we go again. Rich does not sell parasitic suppressors. He sells material to build them. // Tom -- does lower Rp mean more VHF gain or less? zzzzzzz - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measur; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00317.html (10,436 bytes)
14. [AMPS] a sticky issue. (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 19:32:23 -0700; No one has claimed this so far. The Rp of a copper-wire suppressor can be made even lower than the Rp of a resistance-wire suppressor by increasing L-supp. The trade-off is increased dissipation in; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00318.html (9,880 bytes)
15. [AMPS] a sticky issue. (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 20:08:56 -0700; Your proposed 28-Nov. sample problem is still in Will's archive. With no changes whatsoever it torpedos your argument. This is the likely reason you tried to cancel it. The AL-1500 reportedly has c.; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00320.html (10,111 bytes)
16. [AMPS] a sticky issue. (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements); Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 22:39:02 -0500; This should be no surprise. I have the 10-20 meter section of a AL-1500 tank coil in my left hand as I type. I can totally conceal it by wrapping my fingers around it. It is made out of square bent; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00322.html (8,801 bytes)
17. [AMPS] a sticky issue. (score: 1): Author: dcckc@ncn.net (dcckc); Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 00:10:00 -0500; Remember in the last few days we have been told equipment has to be designed for the cheap and the ignorant -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administ; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00323.html (9,493 bytes)
18. [AMPS] a sticky issue. (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 01:13:04 -0700; Indeed. At the other end of the spectrum we find a 1000pF "bypass" on the anode supply. At 1.8MHz, 1000pF has 88-ohms of Xc. It is my opinion that this does not represent good engineering practice.; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00324.html (9,477 bytes)
19. [AMPS] a sticky issue. (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 08:55:26 -0400; Actually that is true. It doesn't mean everyone doesn't know how to tune a PA or is cheap, but the fact is many people don't. You'd be amazed at the calls! One fellow bought a CE approved AL811H tha; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00326.html (10,643 bytes)
20. [AMPS] a sticky issue. (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements); Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 10:01:14 -0500; Just hanging around a ham store and listening to the phone conversations should convince anyone that the "dumbing down" of our society in general has definitely reached the amateur radio community!; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00329.html (9,116 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]