Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+graphite\s+anodes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+graphite\s+anodes\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] graphite anodes (score: 1): Author: Peter.Chadwick@gpsemi.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 12:02:33 +0100; Tom, you say Looking at the 'history' in the books, they seem to have been making this point about graphite anodes for at least 60 years, so it seems a bit strange that Amperex are not putting the ef; /archives//html/Amps/1997-09/msg00267.html (7,219 bytes)
2. [AMPS] graphite anodes (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net); Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 10:35:47 +0000; To: <amps@contesting.com> Hi Peter, Eimac used to do that, now Triton is. They use some tantalum and zirconium (that's the dull gray coating on the anode). That's why the anode has to run at the poi; /archives//html/Amps/1997-09/msg00300.html (7,426 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]