Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+leakage\s+current\s+of\s+electrolytics\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+leakage\s+current\s+of\s+electrolytics\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] leakage current of electrolytics (score: 1): Author: zeitler@ibm.net (zeitler@ibm.net); Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 21:39:27 -0700; What is the acceptable limit for leakage current on electrolytic capacitors? The units in use are 560uF 400 volt and 470uF 450 volt. I am measuring around 2 to 300 hundred micramps at the max voltage; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00294.html (7,169 bytes)
2. [AMPS] leakage current of electrolytics (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 12:05:01 +0100; Lane asks: Professionally, I've seen figures quoted of a maximum of 2 microamps/microfarad as a maximum. Even if you halve that, you're still OK with the figures quoted. 73 Peter G3RZP -- FAQ on WWW:; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00295.html (7,297 bytes)
3. [AMPS] leakage current of electrolytics (score: 1): Author: phil@vaxxine.com (Phil (VA3UX)); Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 10:22:35; Those numbers are "peanuts" Lane and indicate the units you tested are in decent shape. The manufacturer's catalogs usually include a simple formula for calculating the expected/satisfactory leakage; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00301.html (8,751 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]