Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+low\s+output\s+on\s+10\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+low\s+output\s+on\s+10\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] low output on 10 (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 12:55:38 +0100; Why is the output low on the higher frequencies? I agree with Carl that it often is a sign, but I fail to understand why. If the peak cathode current is available on 80m to give full output, why isn'; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00469.html (7,521 bytes)
2. [AMPS] low output on 10 (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 09:06:45 +0000; To: <amps@contesting.com> While emission deterioration is the same across all frequencies, it is more noticable on frequencies where the system is on the edge of just having enough gain. 73, Tom W8JI; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00476.html (7,317 bytes)
3. [AMPS] low output on 10 (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Fri, 22 May 98 09:14:52 -0500; This is a question I am having too. My 4-1000A puts out several hundred less watts on 10 meters than on 80 (1000 on 10 vs. 1700 on 80). Does the gain of the tube drop from 80 to 10 meters that much; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00480.html (7,904 bytes)
4. [AMPS] low output on 10 (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Fri, 22 May 98 07:37:02 -0800; To: <amps@contesting.com> However, for a tube that is rated at full input at 110MHz, 28MHz would seemingly not be on the edge. Rich... R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures -- FA; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00484.html (7,481 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]