Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+network\s+analysis\s+rules\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+network\s+analysis\s+rules\!\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] network analysis rules! (score: 1): Author: gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU (gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU); Date: Sat, 16 May 1998 11:16:48 +0000; hi all, i'm not an EE, i'm only a lowly physicist, so forgive me a very simple-minded approach to what seems to be a problem to some subscribers on this reflector. i'd like to find the resistance (Re; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00282.html (9,623 bytes)
2. [AMPS] network analysis rules! (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Sat, 16 May 98 11:39:11 -0800; Is it reasonable to conclude that the rules for DC circuits, where the volts and amps are always in phase, apply broadly to AC circuits, where the volts and amps are not always in phase? Some amplif; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00283.html (10,527 bytes)
3. [AMPS] network analysis rules! (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Sat, 16 May 98 15:46:12 -0500; Great post, George. I agree totally with your analysis. I feel silly that I didn't see the forest for the trees before Ian's step by step post. To quote Homer Simpson, "DOH!" 73, Jon KE9NA -- Jon Og; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00290.html (7,344 bytes)
4. [AMPS] network analysis rules! (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Sat, 16 May 98 15:59:00 -0500; The series to parallel conversions that we have been discussing apply most definitely to AC circuits. The whole fact that you calculate an inductor to have a certain reactance means that it is opera; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00291.html (8,042 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]