Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+parasites\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+parasites\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] parasites (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 10:30:44 +0100; It should be remembered that if the parasitic resonant frequency of the grid circuit is ABOVE the parasitic resonant frequency of the anode circuit, then it doesn't oscillate - which is an explanatio; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00249.html (7,169 bytes)
2. [AMPS] parasites (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 09:43:53 -0400; Hi Peter, of the 3CX5000s, 8877's, 3CX1200Z7's all fit that category IF the grid is grounded properly. It seems more a matter of the internal grid structure than anything. Sweeping the 8877 with a ne; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00254.html (8,342 bytes)
3. [AMPS] parasites (score: 1): Author: jtml@lanl.gov (John Lyles); Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 12:48:45 -0700; It seems that the bandwidth being used to carry on the parasitic discussion is excessive. My delete keys is getting mashed hourly now. There are other discussions of the subject in print, from years; /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00056.html (8,001 bytes)
4. [AMPS] parasites (score: 1): Author: lawrence.wald@lerc.nasa.gov (L. Wald); Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 14:59:04 -0500 (EST); My biggest problem is that the slugs in my SB-220 tuned input network have started to breed and the RF grubs are digesting the teflon dielectric in the wiring. Anyone know how to get rid of these par; /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00057.html (7,209 bytes)
5. [AMPS] parasites (score: 1): Author: dail@CEBAF.GOV (Walter Dail); Date: Wed, 03 Dec 1997 15:15:32 -0500; Try Hot Shot. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: ht; /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00058.html (7,900 bytes)
6. [AMPS] parasites (score: 1): Author: k1ta@earthlink.net (Bob Marston); Date: Wed, 03 Dec 1997 19:16:10 -0800; I don't think so John. Did you read Rich Measures' last post before you canned it? Or Dick Ehrhorn's comment's a couple of days ago? I agree with you the debate has ended. But things are getting real; /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00065.html (7,422 bytes)
7. [AMPS] parasites (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Thu, 04 Dec 1997 02:13:40 EST; Only in your dreams did Heath use Teflon wiring. For stuck slugs ....in the amp and not chambered in a 44 Magnum, try a bit of Lacquer Thinner down the holes once you have the amp tipped up. A bit of; /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00067.html (8,620 bytes)
8. [Amps] Parasites (score: 1): Author: "Harold B. Mandel" <ka1xo@juno.com>; Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:38:14 -0500; Gentlemen, gentlemen, The effect of Microbe wire can be easily nullified with the correct positioning of the Wouff Hong. Now if you think I'm wrong you go ask every OT op out there..... Happy New Yea; /archives//html/Amps/2005-01/msg00024.html (6,329 bytes)
9. [Amps] Parasites (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 03:10:29 -0800; Has anyone ever read an article from a tube manufacturer about feedback-C in vacuum tubes and what measures to take to counteract it -- i. e., lessen the likelihood of a parasitic oscillation ? Richa; /archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00043.html (6,156 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]