Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+re\s+failures\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+re\s+failures\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] re failures (score: 1): Author: Peter.Chadwick@gpsemi.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 09:53:00 +0100; I guess that we're all agreed that a cathode (as opposed to a filament) is likely to be seriously damaged under the proposed bias/filament supply failure scenario, and that some form of interlocking; /archives//html/Amps/1997-06/msg00278.html (8,460 bytes)
2. [AMPS] re failures (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 19 Jun 97 07:04:13 -0700; A fuse seems unlikely to prevent cathode stripping. A 723/opto interlock is indicated--or use a 'instant-on' thoriated tungsten filament type tube instead of a heater type tube. Nothing is what happ; /archives//html/Amps/1997-06/msg00280.html (8,745 bytes)
3. [AMPS] re failures (score: 1): Author: W8IK@IBM.NET (Joe Subich, W8IK); Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 19:48:29 -0400; Enough of the personal attacks and snide remarks ... Can you point to any commercially available AMATEUR amplifier in general release (something that sells more than a hand full of copies a year) tha; /archives//html/Amps/1997-06/msg00292.html (8,184 bytes)
4. [AMPS] re failures (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 19 Jun 97 17:21:12 -0700; ...snip... I have never heard of ANY amplifier that uses such a device. Rich-- R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.co; /archives//html/Amps/1997-06/msg00294.html (7,501 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]