- 1. [AMPS] receivers (score: 1)
- Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:44:28 -0500
- Here are some specs: But back to Tom's point. I went through a number of swept test data and was surprised to find that my generalization was not true in all cases. Here is the 5-kHz data for the rig
- /archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00369.html (8,534 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] receivers (score: 1)
- Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick)
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 07:51:37 -0000
- Tom, how do you define Blocking Dynamic Range? 73 Peter G3RZP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com P
- /archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00374.html (7,707 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] receivers (score: 1)
- Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 10:30:20 -0500
- Blocking dynamic range is the ratio of the weakest signal that can be heard to a signal off-frequency that causes a detectable difference in noise or level of the desired signal. 73, Tom W8JI w8ji@c
- /archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00385.html (8,003 bytes)
- 4. [AMPS] receivers (score: 1)
- Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick)
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:50:32 -0000
- So it's a sort of mixture of phase noise performance and gain compression. Needs a good signal generator to measure - or do it at 21.4MHz minus a few kHz with a 21.4MHz filter cleaning up the sig gen
- /archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00390.html (8,516 bytes)
- 5. [AMPS] receivers (score: 1)
- Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:57:33 -0500
- I don't know. When I measure stuff on transmitters and receivers here there is a big difference between different pieces of gear. I'm amazed at the difference. 73, Tom W8JI w8ji@contesting.com -- FA
- /archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00395.html (8,353 bytes)
- 6. [AMPS] receivers (score: 1)
- Author: sm5ki@algonet.se (Hans Goldschmidt)
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 21:57:35 +0000
- 1-01-15 22.44, skrev Tom Rauch på w8ji@contesting.com följande: " What is wrong with present days receivers" from 1956 QST stated you have to have your selectivity as close to the antenna
- /archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00399.html (10,695 bytes)
- 7. [AMPS] receivers (score: 1)
- Author: sm5ki@algonet.se (Hans Goldschmidt)
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 21:57:35 +0000
- 1-01-16 15.50, skrev Peter Chadwick på Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com följande: In the ARRL curves very often there is a spike abt 15 khz away from the carrier from the switched supply or maybe
- /archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00400.html (9,503 bytes)
- 8. [AMPS] receivers (score: 1)
- Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick)
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 07:58:47 -0000
- I did a lot of work on IMD in crystal filters back in the mid 1970's. The ferrite transformer business I found interesting, since I was never able to find a filter where the ferrite transformer was t
- /archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00404.html (10,038 bytes)
- 9. [AMPS] receivers (score: 1)
- Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:21:22 -0500
- Peter replied: It's amazing what a single incorrect article can start. Because of stuff in ham books, people think: 1.) Folded unipoles improve antenna ground system system efficiency. 2.) Ferrites
- /archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00427.html (9,335 bytes)
- 10. [AMPS] receivers (score: 1)
- Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:57:36 -0800
- "incorrect article" = examines self-declared expert's decrees. depends on Webers per cubic meter. If the output waveform is notably distorted, you have core saturation. ? see Figure 24 on my Web sit
- /archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00437.html (9,179 bytes)
- 11. [AMPS] receivers (score: 1)
- Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick)
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:33:07 -0000
- That generally (but not always) goes with heat in the core, too. Of course, tiny cores can saturate at powers so low you don't notice the heat. I worked on a project once with transformers that didn'
- /archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00452.html (8,930 bytes)
- 12. [AMPS] receivers (score: 1)
- Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick)
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:47:52 -0000
- I know some antenna professionals who think that, too. I think it's because there's two definitions in the text books for radiation resistance - one that's right all the time, and one that's right un
- /archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00454.html (8,524 bytes)
- 13. [AMPS] receivers (score: 1)
- Author: drkirkby@ntlworld.com (David Kirkby)
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:32:50 +0000
- It would seem that paralleling high voltage transformers of slightly different voltages does quite a good job of that !! -- Dr. David Kirkby Ph.D, email: drkirkby@ntlwold.com (formally davek@medphys.
- /archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00455.html (8,093 bytes)
- 14. [AMPS] receivers (score: 1)
- Author: sm5ki@algonet.se (Hans Goldschmidt)
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:39:39 +0000
- 1-01-18 08.33, skrev Peter Chadwick på Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com följande: As far as I remember there were several articles regarding this subject in some old German magazines by Martin. On
- /archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00456.html (10,533 bytes)
- 15. [AMPS] receivers (score: 1)
- Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick)
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:07:22 -0000
- There was an article by Ulrich Rohde in Ham radio about time, in which there was front end described using an XF9B. I wrote to Ulrich, pointing out that there was a problem with the filter: he wrote
- /archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00457.html (8,355 bytes)
- 16. [AMPS] receivers (score: 1)
- Author: ac6tk@cybertime.net (J. Bradshaw)
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:33:56 -0800
- there's two definitions in the text books for radiation resistance - one that's right all the time, and one that's right under certain conditions. The other complication is that folding the antenna
- /archives//html/Amps/2001-01/msg00473.html (8,593 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu