Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+single\s+tube\s+vs\.\s+twins\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+single\s+tube\s+vs\.\s+twins\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] single tube vs. twins (score: 1): Author: w5kp@swbell.net (J. G. Kincade); Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 18:25:05 -0500; Having run only 3-500Z's most of my QRO career, can someone enlighten me on the pros/cons of a single 4CX1600B vs. two 3CX800A7's? I use an amp only for casual DX and nets, and work contests for fun; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00197.html (7,017 bytes)
2. [AMPS] single tube vs. twins (score: 1): Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it); Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:37:45 +0200; Generally speaking single or paired has small practical differences in performance of an HF amplifiaer but often, the price to buy two (real transmitting) tubes is higher than the price of a single a; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00199.html (8,489 bytes)
3. [AMPS] single tube vs. twins (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 08:52:31 +0100; I agree with Mauri; the choice is often more a case of what is available. Parallel tubes have a possibility of push - pull mode parasitics, but that is really a minor matter. Sometimes parallel tubes; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00200.html (7,126 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]