Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+slam\s+tally\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+slam\s+tally\s*$/: 44 ]

Total 44 documents matching your query.

21. [AMPS] slam tally (score: 1): Author: w8ik@ibm.net (Joe Subich, W8IK/4); Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 22:48:37 -0400; Rich runs this non-issue into the ground again ... WA4GPM is no longer employed at Eimac/Varian as he left to join Triton when the glass tube division was sold and moved east. Since you called Eimac/; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00283.html (9,579 bytes)
22. [AMPS] slam tally (score: 1): Author: dwindk3bhj@fuse.net (David J. Windisch); Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 15:28:02 -0400; To: All concerned Who are the eight-hundred-pound gorillas in this slam-dunk contest? Who are the lurkers? Building stuff of any kind is a *laboratory* experience -- from idea to fruition. If you've; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00284.html (9,946 bytes)
23. [AMPS] slam tally (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 11:26:36 +0100; Hopefully, the acrimony of disagreement can be tempered by adherence to the usages of polite debate. Thus, even if the opposing view is considered to be infantile bunk dreamed up by a demented mind,; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00285.html (9,149 bytes)
24. [AMPS] slam tally (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 04:10:14 -0700; ? Infantile bunk tends to be self-advertising. ? Would you consider it bad form to state that alleged facts were contradicted by the personnel dept. of the former employer? Rich... R. L. Measures, 8; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00287.html (9,155 bytes)
25. [AMPS] slam tally (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 12:50:32 +0100; Rebuttal of facts is an accepted part of debate. To say that evidence is available to rebut a set of facts stated by one of the parties, and to produce that evidence is one thing - and is acceptable:; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00288.html (9,152 bytes)
26. [AMPS] slam tally (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Wed, 9 Jun 99 08:40:40 -0500; Rich, I guess the entire world is wrong and you are right regarding the level that Buzz had while at Eimac. Did you ever stop to think that perhaps the person you spoke to in personnel gave you inco; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00291.html (9,382 bytes)
27. [AMPS] slam tally (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 16:48:36 +0100; years..... 'Catbert, the Evil HR Director' (for those who follow Dilbert) is not that far from the truth. 73 Peter G3RZP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contest; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00293.html (8,787 bytes)
28. [AMPS] slam tally (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 09:29:20 -0700; ? What possible motive could the personnel dept. spokesperson have for giving a false job description title for a former employee who was "well-liked". . ? As I recall, according to the spokesperson; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00294.html (9,452 bytes)
29. [AMPS] slam tally (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 09:29:26 -0700; It's all in the grate debate archive. If anyone would like to RX a one-piece searchable copy, an e-mail request to yours truly is all that's needed. Chunks are available as well. State the area of i; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00295.html (9,477 bytes)
30. [AMPS] slam tally (score: 1): Author: jimsmith@gotnet.net (Jim Smith); Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 10:48:41 -0700; the That may be, but I don't have to go dumpster diving to find something valuable. Jim Smith, KQ6UV -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrat; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00301.html (8,957 bytes)
31. [AMPS] slam tally (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 13:44:44 +0100; Yes, it's bad form, because: (a) Your assertion - which is contradicted by several other sources - is based on a telephone conversation with some random person in HR who had no incentive to give you; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00303.html (9,589 bytes)
32. [AMPS] slam tally (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 13:02:56 -0500; Actually, I've found a LOT of valuable stuff while dumpster diving in my lifetime: Let's see: A Macintosh (the stereo not the computer) amplifier that now sells for around $1200 at Dayton, an SX-62,; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00304.html (9,047 bytes)
33. [AMPS] slam tally (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 14:10:00 -0400; Moreover, even if the above weren't true, there may be a perfectly innocent explanation of the "discrepancy." Most companies of any size have separate salary "grades", that are distinct from function; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00305.html (10,151 bytes)
34. [AMPS] slam tally (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 12:49:34 -0700; ? What is HR? // The person I spoke with was an employee in the Varian/Eimac SLC facility's personnel office. A quite likely incentive to give accurate information is the possiblility of job termina; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00307.html (10,427 bytes)
35. [AMPS] slam tally (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 14:13:47 -0700; ? which is why a sent a postcard to Mr. Miklos shortly thereafter notifying him of the situation. ? Engineer B is the bottom grade. ? As I recall the telephone inquiry,: I gave my name. I stated tha; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00311.html (10,553 bytes)
36. [AMPS] slam tally (score: 1): Author: w8ik@ibm.net (Joe Subich, W8IK/4); Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 19:55:06 -0400; Did is ever occur to you that "Engineer B" can have different meanings depending on the organization (company)? I've been in some companies, even negotiated union contracts, in which the "pecking or; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00314.html (10,031 bytes)
37. [AMPS] slam tally (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 18:00:17 -0700; ? not the issue, Joe. Rich... R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00317.html (8,831 bytes)
38. [AMPS] slam tally (score: 1): Author: W4EF@pacbell.net (Michael Tope); Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 17:47:16 -0700; High level technical and managerial appointments are typically published in trade rags like Microwaves and RF magazine. If anyone knows about when Mr. Miklos was promoted (actually or allegedly) to t; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00318.html (11,807 bytes)
39. [AMPS] slam tally (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 19:14:09 -0700; ? Why not telephone the personnel dept. at Eimac/Varian's Salt Lake City Facility? - cheers, Mike Rich... R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contest; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00321.html (8,490 bytes)
40. [AMPS] slam tally (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 22:56:57 +0100; No... and that's precisely the point that you're missing about all this. 73 from Ian G3SEK Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book' 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.demon.co.uk/g3sek; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00328.html (9,172 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]