- 1. [AMPS] small rice burners (score: 1)
- Author: jtml@lanl.gov (John T. M. Lyles)
- Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 15:24:47 -0600
- I would like to open a topic which is probably covered somewhere else, but this is the only ham radio forum that I read on email. I am interested in getting a modern exciter, such as the new HF rigs
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00049.html (7,727 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] small rice burners (score: 1)
- Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
- Date: Tue, 4 May 99 17:02:03 -0500
- While I am a Yaesu man, I gotta admit that the Icom IC706 Mark IIG is a pretty darn nice radio. I think it is nicer and better laid out than the FT-100 Field Commander from Yaesu. If I were to buy o
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00050.html (8,094 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] small rice burners (score: 1)
- Author: vk6apk@eon.net.au (Alek Petkovic)
- Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 06:53:55 +0800
- I have the Alinco DX70T at the moment which I have used very extensively for HF mobile operation. It's a brilliant little radio which does the job very nicely. They can be picked up at absolutely bar
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00052.html (9,197 bytes)
- 4. [AMPS] small rice burners (score: 1)
- Author: RFpower@radiodan.com (Radiodan W7RF)
- Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 16:12:16 -0700
- I too love my IC-706 (original model). I like the FT-100 in many ways except reliability (at least for now). My friend Rich WU6T is on his 4th radio! He has taken it back for service directly to Yaes
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00054.html (10,223 bytes)
- 5. [AMPS] small rice burners (score: 1)
- Author: w0opw@yahoo.com (PD Wintheiser)
- Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 08:42:19 -0700 (PDT)
- I bought the DX70T new about 2 years ago and tested it on receive against my older IC725 with a 2 pole coax switch. The noise level from the Alinco was S7 compared to S3 on the Icom. I returned the u
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00076.html (7,698 bytes)
- 6. [AMPS] small rice burners (score: 1)
- Author: vk6apk@eon.net.au (Alek Petkovic)
- Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 06:43:30 +0800
- Yes but S meter calibration has absolutely nothing to do with receiver performance. Yes and I bet that fits into the dashboard of the car very nicely as well. 73 de Alek, VK6APK. -- FAQ on WWW: http
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00083.html (7,801 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu