Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+typical\s+versus\s+Max\s+ratings\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+typical\s+versus\s+Max\s+ratings\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] typical versus Max ratings (score: 1): Author: jtml@lanl.gov (John Lyles); Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 09:04:27 -0700; I'm sure that this has been discussed and debated before, but here's about 2 cents worth: As for those Eimac "Typical" ratings in the datasheets. I believe that those are normally the result of one o; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00322.html (8,003 bytes)
2. [AMPS] typical versus Max ratings (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 12:49:11 EST; In more realistic sized tubes that the majority of this reflector is concerned with I note that the Eimac sheets state "measured" and often include a frequency. I would not expect them to actually me; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00324.html (10,458 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]