Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]n4kw\@citrus\.infi\.net\s+RJ\-iA\s+relay\s+contact\-life\s+on\s+CW\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS]n4kw@citrus.infi.net RJ-iA relay contact-life on CW? (score: 1)
Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 08:42:12 -0700
? My measurements indicated a shorter period of contact bounce for both relays. . With a 110v.oc current-limited source, neither relay fully closed in under 1.7mS. ? Do you mean 2mS for initial make
/archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00057.html (16,540 bytes)

2. [AMPS]n4kw@citrus.infi.net RJ-iA relay contact-life on CW? (score: 1)
Author: Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 12:25:22 -0400
? Owners of FT-1000Ds have reported seeing RF output at 5mS. FWIW, my resent measurements of three popular transceivers are as follows: TS-950SDX -- 15ms FT-990 -- 10ms FT-1000mp -- 8ms Unfortunatle
/archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00063.html (11,044 bytes)

3. [AMPS]n4kw@citrus.infi.net RJ-iA relay contact-life on CW? (score: 1)
Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 10:42:54 -0700
? does the amplifier control signal pass through a relay in the 990? -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@conte
/archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00065.html (10,596 bytes)

4. [AMPS]n4kw@citrus.infi.net RJ-iA relay contact-life on CW? (score: 1)
Author: Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 16:34:26 -0400
? does the amplifier control signal pass through a relay in the 990? Ooops. I should have been more clear about this. I didn't measure relay closure time on any of the rigs. I timed only the solid-s
/archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00070.html (10,551 bytes)

5. [AMPS]n4kw@citrus.infi.net RJ-iA relay contact-life on CW? (score: 1)
Author: RFpower@radiodan.com (Radiodan W7RF)
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 14:09:31 -0700
Wait a minute! Who is correct on these radio switching times? According to Rich , the relays in HENRYS switch too slowly to prevent hot switching "which is not quick enough to prevent hotswitching wi
/archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00071.html (14,144 bytes)

6. [AMPS]n4kw@citrus.infi.net RJ-iA relay contact-life on CW? (score: 1)
Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 20:46:11 -0700
? ... not a good bet. A 50A relay can hotswitch for years without failure. Hotswitching is not considered to be good engineering practice, Dan. . Rich... R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcne
/archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00081.html (9,166 bytes)

7. [AMPS]n4kw@citrus.infi.net RJ-iA relay contact-life on CW? (score: 1)
Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 20:46:15 -0700
? ? Warning: This document has erronius attribution marks. ? agreed ? Why cater to lock-to-talk miscreants? Lock-to-talk is unnecessary. With SSB VOX, amp tubes cut off in a fraction of a second dur
/archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00082.html (12,391 bytes)

8. [AMPS]n4kw@citrus.infi.net RJ-iA relay contact-life on CW? (score: 1)
Author: KA2YKC@aol.com (KA2YKC@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 11:08:14 EDT
<< BTW, I've not gotten any of Dick's messages on this subject from the reflector. I'm only getting them as quoted in Rich's replies. Are they being sent to the reflector? 73, Dick WC1M same here, th
/archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00097.html (8,757 bytes)

9. [AMPS]n4kw@citrus.infi.net RJ-iA relay contact-life on CW? (score: 1)
Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 08:45:33 -0700
? congrats on picking up on the spelling glitch. (wrong attribution marks) (correct attribution marks) ? Various attribution level marks (>, >>, >>>, >>>>) help readers to identify who said what whe
/archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00100.html (10,051 bytes)

10. [AMPS]n4kw@citrus.infi.net RJ-iA relay contact-life on CW? (score: 1)
Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick)
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 16:58:58 +0100
Wasn't 'Erronius' a Roman general who did things wrong? 73 Peter G3RZP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@con
/archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00101.html (8,469 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu