Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+\*\*\*\s+SPAM\s+\*\*\*\s+RE\:\s+Parasitic\s+Resistors\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+\*\*\*\s+SPAM\s+\*\*\*\s+RE\:\s+Parasitic\s+Resistors\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] *** SPAM *** RE: Parasitic Resistors (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:19:32 +0200 (CEST); this application.< It depends. Parasitic suppression is very dependent on a number of things, especially layout and lead lengths and tubes and components... I like a process of empiric eclecticism.; /archives//html/Amps/2006-06/msg00554.html (7,227 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]