- 1. [Amps] 2006 ARRL Handbook (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Maser" <bmaser@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 17:20:05 -0400
- After a month wait, my ARRL 2006 handbook finally arrived. I have been looking forward to looking at the 3CX1500D7 amplifier designed and constructed by K8RA, Jerry Pittenger. The most original secti
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00173.html (8,666 bytes)
- 2. [Amps] 2006 ARRL Handbook (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Maser" <bmaser@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 17:28:27 -0400
- I forgot to mention that Jerry did a great job in building this amp. The pics showed that attention to detail resulted in a beautiful amplifier that certainly rivals and often surpasses the commercia
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00174.html (6,611 bytes)
- 3. [Amps] 2006 ARRL Handbook (score: 1)
- Author: Wt8r@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 13:11:51 EDT
- Sounds like a good project for the gang here on the reflector to take on. There used to be a page in the back of each handbook to enter errors found to be sent to ARRL HQ. When my new one comes, I'll
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00210.html (7,396 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Amps] 2006 ARRL Handbook (score: 1)
- Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu
- Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 12:12:57 -0700
- < snip > It may be easier, but this isn't what has happened in my experience. As the author of the "Sunnyvale/St. Petersburg" amplifier part of Chapter 13, I was frequently in contact with a handbook
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00213.html (8,047 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Amps] 2006 ARRL Handbook (score: 1)
- Author: Wt8r@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 15:26:29 EDT
- < snip > My comment is directed mainly toward older versions of the Handbook. I know several hams who sent corrections to the ARRL and none were ever included in newer editions of the HB. 73 de Dace
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00214.html (7,120 bytes)
- 6. Re: [Amps] 2006 ARRL Handbook (score: 1)
- Author: Dan K9ZF <n9rla@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:16:32 -0500
- Sounds like a good project for the gang here on the reflector to take on. Sounds real similar to a thread that came up awhile back, called amps 101, or something similar. I don't think it really pick
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00216.html (7,702 bytes)
- 7. Re: [Amps] 2006 ARRL Handbook (score: 1)
- Author: "Phil Clements" <philc@texascellnet.com>
- Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 15:39:31 -0500
- Amen, George. When I did the article "QSK for the Heathkit SB-220 in January, 1980 QST, my worst fear was that the final draft would contain errors requiring the dreaded "correction" blurb in a subs
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00217.html (9,274 bytes)
- 8. Re: [Amps] 2006 ARRL Handbook (score: 1)
- Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
- Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 14:44:24 -0700
- This was how they talked me into writing the amplifier chapter for the new, improved '95 Handbook. Months later, when the Editor phoned me and told me to stop writing, I remembered the adage about le
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00221.html (8,330 bytes)
- 9. Re: [Amps] 2006 ARRL Handbook (score: 1)
- Author: Gary Smith <wa6fgi@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:01:50 -0700
- To all: an error that may or may not be corrected by this time that was in an earlier handbook: "be careful when connecting the 240 v 40a 2 gage wires to the double aught grounded buss bar." 73 Gary.
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00222.html (8,832 bytes)
- 10. Re: [Amps] 2006 ARRL Handbook (score: 1)
- Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>
- Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 18:08:29 -0400
- I'd sure like to see a video tape of that................ 73, Ken W2DTC _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/list
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00223.html (8,234 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu