Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+2x813\s+or\s+2x3\-500zg\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+2x813\s+or\s+2x3\-500zg\s+\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] 2x813 or 2x3-500zg ? (score: 1): Author: Mike Bondarev <mikebond@mosfirm.ru>; Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 10:42:34 +0300; Hello to everybody! Happy New Year 2008! In the coming year I would like to build an amplifier for "everyday use". For the contesting I already made the amplifier with GU-84B and GM3SEK's tetrode boa; /archives//html/Amps/2007-12/msg00281.html (7,097 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] 2x813 or 2x3-500zg ? (score: 1): Author: "Roger" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:32:29 -0500; My personal opinions: The 813 is a nice tube and I have built amps using them. However the 3-500Z is a current tube, in production, and not outlandishly priced. As far as as a matched pair, I've neve; /archives//html/Amps/2007-12/msg00282.html (8,150 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] 2x813 or 2x3-500zg ? (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 08:36:44 -0500; The 813 is almost a 70 year old design yet it is still one of the best tubes ever made. Brand new US military surplus ones are on Ebay on a regular basis and at very low prices. No matching is requir; /archives//html/Amps/2007-12/msg00283.html (8,642 bytes)
4. [Amps] 2x813 or 2x3-500zg ? (score: 1): Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>; Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:42:32 -0500; On 31st December, Mike wrote... "... I was thinking about two 813 in grounded grid configurations but now I'm thinking why not the pair of 3-500zg from RF-parts? I newer used 3-500zg before so I can'; /archives//html/Amps/2007-12/msg00285.html (7,585 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]