Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+3CPX800A7\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+3CPX800A7\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] 3CPX800A7 (score: 1): Author: Michael Zeglen <kl7ai@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:30:21 -0800; Has anyone replaced the 3CX800A7 in the Titan 425 with 3CPX800A7 tubes? Any mods needed or things to be aware of? _________________________________________________________________ Life on your PC is; /archives//html/Amps/2008-12/msg00289.html (6,422 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] 3CPX800A7 (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@doctorgary.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:26:21 -0500; That's what I did with mine. Absolutely no problem I came across in the least. I have the ones that came out of it as spares. Same output though, don't expect to see new red lining by exchanging the; /archives//html/Amps/2008-12/msg00299.html (7,200 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] 3CPX800A7 (score: 1): Author: "W1UJ@arrl.net" <W1UJ@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:56:04 -0500; This looks like an awesome mod for the Titan, I don't get the feeling the P is a drop in. http://hamradiomarket.com/articles/Titan%20P%20Hybrid.htm. My contest group has 2 of these which take a huge; /archives//html/Amps/2008-12/msg00312.html (7,511 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] 3CPX800A7 (score: 1): Author: Gudguyham@aol.com; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:01:10 EST; This looks like an awesome mod for the Titan, I don't get the feeling the P is a drop in. The "P" can be dropped in with no problem. No extra gain though. **One site keeps you connected to all your e; /archives//html/Amps/2008-12/msg00314.html (7,692 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] 3CPX800A7 (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:29:17 -0800; It will certainly increase the power headroom available. Using that power to safely run at the legal limit on RTTY in a contest without risk of failure is fine. Using it to exceed the legal limit is; /archives//html/Amps/2008-12/msg00317.html (7,797 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] 3CPX800A7 (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:16:16 -0500; The P is a complete drop in without any changes when you stay with the original PS. Ive upgraded many amps that way for customers. The original 3CX800A7 Eimac spec sheet sent to OEM's listed 2500V at; /archives//html/Amps/2008-12/msg00320.html (8,887 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] 3CPX800A7 (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@doctorgary.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 08:13:51 -0500; Hi Jay, As we speak I have two 3CPX800A7 tubes in my 425. I have done no other modifications to it. The P is a drop in. I'd looked at that page before and it sounds interesting. Seeing as Dick Frey; /archives//html/Amps/2008-12/msg00324.html (8,765 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] 3CPX800A7 (score: 1): Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 13:59:20 -0500; They are basically the same tube except the "P" has more cathode emission capability (IIRC). They are physically the same so there is no more "head room" than with the regular 3CX800. IOW used in a g; /archives//html/Amps/2008-12/msg00330.html (9,169 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] 3CPX800A7 (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 10:12:53 -0500; As previously noted the primary benefit of the pulse version is cost and availability as medical pulls. Their production is also much higher than the non pulse version. Carl KM1H ____________________; /archives//html/Amps/2008-12/msg00339.html (10,739 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] 3CPX800A7 (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hewitt" <wd7s@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:57:33 -0800; Hi Rodger Physically the tubes are not the same. The (Eimac)CPX version has a taller ceramic portion allowing a much higher plate voltage, (3500 volts). Svetlana made this tube with the taller cerami; /archives//html/Amps/2008-12/msg00343.html (10,685 bytes)
11. [Amps] 3CPX800A7 (score: 1): Author: Charles Bibb <zedkay@telepak.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:36:57 -0600; Need a little info guys: I found the data sheet for the 3CPX800A7 at the CPI/Eimac website, but this data sheet looks as though a few things have been left off. They say the tube is "intended for use; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00309.html (6,903 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] 3CPX800A7 (score: 1): Author: N7SC <n7sc@charter.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:15:48 -0800; Charles... Try this...http://www.g8wrb.org/data/Eimac/3CX800A7.pdf Steve _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/list; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00313.html (7,942 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] 3CPX800A7 (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:50:25 -0500; Use the 3CX800A7 data sheet. The minor internal differences will have no effect in anamp except for a very slight tuning difference on 10 or 6M Carl KM1H _____________________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00318.html (8,369 bytes)
14. Re: [Amps] 3CPX800A7 (score: 1): Author: Gudguyham@aol.com; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:02:04 EST; Treat a 3CPX800A7 exactly like you would a 3CX800 in GG, and it will work fine, same for the 3CPX1500A7, both can be dropped in replacements. **The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Gra; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00338.html (7,194 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]