Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+3CX1000A7\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] 3CX1000A7 (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (sub1)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:30:55 -0500
In what way? Just never approved yet? 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00308.html (7,907 bytes)

22. Re: [Amps] 3CX1000A7 (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:49:48 -0500
Harmonic and spurious attenuation rules are stricter there. Easy to meet with a stub or LPF. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lis
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00319.html (8,334 bytes)

23. Re: [Amps] 3CX1000A7 (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (sub1)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 05:23:42 -0500
True, but if you look at the tank circuit running a pair isn't is about the same as Palstar uses. Alpha uses a 4CX1500B for the legal limit out with a conventional pin net, or Pi-L. There are a numbe
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00344.html (9,721 bytes)

24. Re: [Amps] 3CX1000A7 (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (sub1)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 05:26:20 -0500
That is no longer the case and even 10 meter amps are again permitted. 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00345.html (8,271 bytes)

25. Re: [Amps] 3CX1000A7 (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:16:47 -0500
The type of tube has no bearing on the harmonics and almost nobody builds PP these days unless its SS. Im sure any well designed Pi or Pi-L and anything else that is self contained to help suppress h
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00349.html (10,950 bytes)

26. Re: [Amps] 3CX1000A7 (score: 1)
Author: k7fm <k7fm@teleport.com>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 15:26:51 -0700
What is the value of a 3CX1000A7 and is there much demand? 73, Colin K7FM _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/lis
/archives//html/Amps/2013-05/msg00166.html (6,646 bytes)

27. Re: [Amps] 3CX1000A7 (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 19:38:45 -0400
It's a great tube There's a NOS on e-bay for $600. It's buy it now and I don't see a time limit. Don't know if they'll get it or not. Too bad it's from Powergridtube. They may be OK, but I don't like
/archives//html/Amps/2013-05/msg00167.html (7,703 bytes)

28. Re: [Amps] 3CX1000A7 (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 20:30:22 -0400
It's a great tube There's a NOS on e-bay for $600. It's buy it now and I don't see a time limit. Don't know if they'll get it or not. Too bad it's from Powergridtube. They may be OK, but I don't like
/archives//html/Amps/2013-05/msg00168.html (8,829 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu