Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+3CX1500\/3CPX1500\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+3CX1500\/3CPX1500\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] 3CX1500/3CPX1500 (score: 1): Author: wd7s at att.net (PAUL HEWITT); Date: Sat Apr 19 10:58:45 2003; The 3CPX1500 is not a drop in replacement for the 3CX1500. The CPX version require a higher filament voltage and slightly more current. 5.5v@11.2a for the CPX versus 5.0v@10.5a for the 3CX1500/8877.; /archives//html/Amps/2003-04/msg00188.html (6,503 bytes)
2. [Amps] 3CX1500/3CPX1500 (score: 1): Author: 2 at vc.net (2); Date: Sun Apr 20 08:31:02 2003; Good point, Paul. The Eimac data sheet: http://www.cpii.com/eimac/catalog/163470.htm. Changing the primary tap on the Henry 4K-Ultra should accomodate the heater requirement. - R. L. Measures, a.k.a; /archives//html/Amps/2003-04/msg00193.html (7,189 bytes)
3. [Amps] 3CX1500/3CPX1500 (score: 1): Author: ham-radio-mail-lists at ahjg.co.uk (Anthony R. Gold); Date: Sun Apr 20 08:31:16 2003; Is it possible that they're actually the same filament, but one must be run hotter for the greater peak current specifications in pulsed service? Tony; /archives//html/Amps/2003-04/msg00195.html (6,803 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]