- 1. [Amps] 4-1000A Vs 3-1000Z (score: 1)
- Author: firson at indosat.net.id (firson@indosat.net.id)
- Date: Mon Jan 27 05:49:12 2003
- Why 4-1000A become popular now for Legal Limit Amplifier. Why people did not use 3-1000Z. Use 3-1000Z on GG will be avoiding the monster 6KV of plate voltage. Firson - YD0LZH
- /archives//html/Amps/2003-01/msg00237.html (6,742 bytes)
- 2. [Amps] 4-1000A Vs 3-1000Z (score: 1)
- Author: 2 at vc.net (2)
- Date: Mon Jan 27 08:40:09 2003
- The 4-1000A Was plentiful. The 3-1000Z has much more feedback-C than a 4-1000A with both grids grounded. For building a VHF oscillator, more feedback-C is better. More V = more gain. The cathode emi
- /archives//html/Amps/2003-01/msg00241.html (6,921 bytes)
- 3. [Amps] 4-1000A Vs 3-1000Z (score: 1)
- Author: wlfuqu00 at uky.edu (Bill Fuqua)
- Date: Mon Jan 27 09:01:23 2003
- 1. 4-1000A is cheaper than 3-1000z 3-1000A $910 4-1000A $640 Above prices from Richardson Electronics either Triton or Amperex....DON'T get TRITON!!!! Amperex tubes are much better. 2. 4-1000A is ava
- /archives//html/Amps/2003-01/msg00242.html (7,553 bytes)
- 4. [Amps] 4-1000A Vs 3-1000Z (score: 1)
- Author: W0YR at aol.com (W0YR@aol.com)
- Date: Mon Jan 27 10:12:09 2003
- One of the reasons the 4-1000-A became so popular was the easy and low-cost availability of "pulls." Broadcast transmitters used the tube in the 50s and 60s (some still do) and there were many which
- /archives//html/Amps/2003-01/msg00243.html (6,976 bytes)
- 5. [Amps] 4-1000A Vs 3-1000Z (score: 1)
- Author: firson at indosat.net.id (Firson Maryutenli)
- Date: Tue Jan 28 09:10:33 2003
- Thanks for the answers I live in Jakarta, Legal Limit Power here is 500 watt for HF, 4-1000A quite big, but I have two pieces, hi... Firson - YD0LZH
- /archives//html/Amps/2003-01/msg00265.html (6,722 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu