Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+4\-1000A\s+Vs\s+3\-1000Z\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] 4-1000A Vs 3-1000Z (score: 1)
Author: firson at indosat.net.id (firson@indosat.net.id)
Date: Mon Jan 27 05:49:12 2003
Why 4-1000A become popular now for Legal Limit Amplifier. Why people did not use 3-1000Z. Use 3-1000Z on GG will be avoiding the monster 6KV of plate voltage. Firson - YD0LZH
/archives//html/Amps/2003-01/msg00237.html (6,742 bytes)

2. [Amps] 4-1000A Vs 3-1000Z (score: 1)
Author: 2 at vc.net (2)
Date: Mon Jan 27 08:40:09 2003
The 4-1000A Was plentiful. The 3-1000Z has much more feedback-C than a 4-1000A with both grids grounded. For building a VHF oscillator, more feedback-C is better. More V = more gain. The cathode emi
/archives//html/Amps/2003-01/msg00241.html (6,921 bytes)

3. [Amps] 4-1000A Vs 3-1000Z (score: 1)
Author: wlfuqu00 at uky.edu (Bill Fuqua)
Date: Mon Jan 27 09:01:23 2003
1. 4-1000A is cheaper than 3-1000z 3-1000A $910 4-1000A $640 Above prices from Richardson Electronics either Triton or Amperex....DON'T get TRITON!!!! Amperex tubes are much better. 2. 4-1000A is ava
/archives//html/Amps/2003-01/msg00242.html (7,553 bytes)

4. [Amps] 4-1000A Vs 3-1000Z (score: 1)
Author: W0YR at aol.com (W0YR@aol.com)
Date: Mon Jan 27 10:12:09 2003
One of the reasons the 4-1000-A became so popular was the easy and low-cost availability of "pulls." Broadcast transmitters used the tube in the 50s and 60s (some still do) and there were many which
/archives//html/Amps/2003-01/msg00243.html (6,976 bytes)

5. [Amps] 4-1000A Vs 3-1000Z (score: 1)
Author: firson at indosat.net.id (Firson Maryutenli)
Date: Tue Jan 28 09:10:33 2003
Thanks for the answers I live in Jakarta, Legal Limit Power here is 500 watt for HF, 4-1000A quite big, but I have two pieces, hi... Firson - YD0LZH
/archives//html/Amps/2003-01/msg00265.html (6,722 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu