Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+4CX1500B\s+project\s+\-\s+swamped\s+grid\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B project - swamped grid (score: 1)
Author: "pfizenmayer" <pfizenmayer2@q.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 22:12:46 -0700
I looked at 50 ohms shunted by 80 pfd -- 2 - 30 mhz - -- series L of 271 nhy and shunt C of 71.5 pfd at input gives better than 23 db return loss from 2 to 30 mhz. I was wondering why Alpha did not l
/archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00162.html (11,457 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B project - swamped grid (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:49:18 -0400
Id be concerned at how well the match holds over the full input cycle. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mail
/archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00163.html (13,518 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B project - swamped grid (score: 1)
Author: "pfizenmayer" <pfizenmayer2@q.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:48:58 -0700
Thought he was talking about no grid current - but even with grid current what other sort of input network would be any better over the swing with regard to match? I would think , without doing the d
/archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00164.html (15,130 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B project - swamped grid (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:20:50 -0400
That 1000 Ohms is for 1.5W of drive. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00165.html (17,011 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B project - swamped grid (score: 1)
Author: donroden@hiwaay.net
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:55:35 -0500
Why not a 1:4 un-un and a 200 ohm swamping with a 3db pad between the exciter and the un-un Don W4DNR _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://list
/archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00166.html (17,895 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B project - swamped grid (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 21:55:13 -0600
Hank, I hope someone will correct me if I am wrong but I believe the problem is the changing input impedance the tube/FET etc. throughout the RF cycle for all classes of operation except heavy class
/archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00170.html (13,898 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B project - swamped grid (score: 1)
Author: peter chadwick <g8on@fsmail.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 10:30:38 +0200
Larry, Can you explain what causes a change in input impedance over the cycle when operating in AB1 i.e no grid current? I can see Miller effect causing some change as the amplitude varies, but not o
/archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00172.html (12,120 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B project - swamped grid (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 07:02:23 -0600
Peter, I can't quantify the change which is probably small but a professor I had in a EE class was emphatic about this topic. At the time I probably didn't grasp it completely. There should be a cont
/archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00173.html (15,106 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B project - swamped grid (score: 1)
Author: peter chadwick <g8on@fsmail.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:24:11 +0200
Larry, Thanks. According to Pappenfus, the change in input capacity in 4CX250B due to variation in electron density between grid and cathode is about 0.1pF, which can cause problems with distortion r
/archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00174.html (15,586 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B project - swamped grid (score: 1)
Author: Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 01:51:55 -0400
Lets see, 50 volt swing on control grid produced 2000 volt swing on plate. Gain during this conductive part of the cycle is 40 so the Miller capacitance during linear part of the cycle is 4.1 pF. The
/archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00175.html (18,465 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B project - swamped grid (score: 1)
Author: peter chadwick <g8on@fsmail.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 08:09:38 +0200
Bill, Agree with your numbers and conclusion. The magnitude of the effects will depend on the swamping resistor. I calculate that at 30 MHz with a 50 ohm swamp, there will be around a 2 degree phase
/archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00176.html (19,422 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B project - swamped grid (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 10:10:15 -0700
REPLY: Where did that figure come from? According to the Eimac 4CX1500B data sheet, the input capacitance in grounded cathode mode is between 75 and 88 pF. 73, Bill W6WRT ____________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00177.html (7,662 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B project - swamped grid (score: 1)
Author: Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 21:32:40 -0400
Sorry, looked up the wrong tube in the wee hours on the morning. But, that was not my real point. In an amplifier with a plate tank circuit with Q>10 the Miller capacitance is not going to change muc
/archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00180.html (11,389 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu