Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+5\s+kw\s+amps\s+\-\-\s+why\?\s*$/: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:24:12 +0000
how abt the yaesu fields and mk v class A options? rob/k5uj In Class A, on a hot day, there would be an advantage. The problem with Class A is finding a >pristine-clean transceiver with which to driv
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00320.html (8,582 bytes)

42. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Frenning, OZ1PIF" <oz1pif@privat.dk>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:12:05 +0200
-- Original Message -- From: "R. Measures" <r@somis.org> To: "Peter Frenning, OZ1PIF" <oz1pif@privat.dk> Cc: "'Barry Kirkwood'" <bjk@ihug.co.nz>; <amps@contesting.com>; "hermans" <on4kj@skynet.be>; "
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00325.html (13,797 bytes)

43. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: Joe Isabella <n3ji@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
Peter -- The drawback is only being able to carry 1500W-pep. Ugly baluns can easily do 10db more. Rich -- No problem, then you just use the next larger size PFTE Coax (can't remember the RG designato
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00326.html (9,891 bytes)

44. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:31:29 -0700
On Oct 20, 2004, at 2:24 PM, Rob Atkinson, K5UJ wrote: how abt the yaesu fields and mk v class A options? It should be good enough. rob/k5uj In Class A, on a hot day, there would be an advantage. The
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00327.html (9,045 bytes)

45. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:35:26 -0700
On Oct 20, 2004, at 3:12 PM, Peter Frenning, OZ1PIF wrote: -- Original Message -- From: "R. Measures" <r@somis.org> To: "Peter Frenning, OZ1PIF" <oz1pif@privat.dk> Cc: "'Barry Kirkwood'" <bjk@ihug.co
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00329.html (14,313 bytes)

46. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 02:25:24 +0200
-- Original Message -- From: "R.Measures" <r@somis.org> To: "Peter Frenning, OZ1PIF" <oz1pif@privat.dk> Cc: "hermans" <on4kj@skynet.be>; <amps@contesting.com>; "'Rob Atkinson, K5UJ'" <k5uj@hotmail.co
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00344.html (10,170 bytes)

47. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: "Harold B. Mandel" <ka1xo@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:36:59 -0400
After trying out an EMTRON DX-3 and finding it prone to self-oscillation without any neutralization circuitry and susceptible to RF Feedback at 18MHz, (enought to illuminate all the LEDs on the bar g
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00345.html (7,890 bytes)

48. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Frenning, OZ1PIF" <oz1pif@privat.dk>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:30:52 +0200
Hi Guillermo 4C65 is a material designator from "Ferroxcube" (formerly "Philips"), a High Impedance material, primarily designed for RFI suppression, it's generally known as "Type 61" material on the
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00350.html (14,368 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 48
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu