Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+813\s+efficiency\s*$/: 57 ]

Total 57 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [Amps] 813 efficiency (score: 1)
Author: peter chadwick <g8on@fsmail.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:55:37 +0100
Carl, them over decades indicates an ICAS Pd of 200-250W is more realistic and use a little air on the glass. I show just a little color on SSB voice peaks at 1200W for 4 tubes. On CW in a contest en
/archives//html/Amps/2013-02/msg00245.html (8,292 bytes)

42. Re: [Amps] 813 efficiency (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 13:59:47 -0800
REPLY: Agreed, that won't happen anytime soon, but all those requirements don't have to happen for silicon to take over everywhere outside of certain areas of New Hampshire. Check the specs for the I
/archives//html/Amps/2013-02/msg00246.html (10,062 bytes)

43. Re: [Amps] 813 efficiency (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:46:12 -0500
Sorry I forgot to mention them as I do not allow any in the house (-; The sheet metal anodes are like 811's, easy to blow a hole in them. Carl KM1H Carl, The 813 was way underated as are many other t
/archives//html/Amps/2013-02/msg00248.html (9,631 bytes)

44. Re: [Amps] 813 efficiency (score: 1)
Author: peter chadwick <g8on@fsmail.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 19:58:22 +0100
I suppose that 32 years in the semiconductor industry has made me somewhat cynical, but I just can't see me being a sand hugger for RF power - not at my age. Peter G3RZP _____________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2013-02/msg00249.html (8,099 bytes)

45. Re: [Amps] 813 efficiency (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:02:45 -0500
When devices become available that can handle 3000W output at any VSWR and do not use any splitters/combiners, PLUS the filters, relays or PIN's, and automatic ATU all hold together I may be interes
/archives//html/Amps/2013-02/msg00250.html (11,390 bytes)

46. Re: [Amps] 813 efficiency (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:14:41 -0800
REPLY: Takes 100 watts for 1 kW output, IMD meets FCC specs. It's a 1 kW amp, if you want to run 1001 watts, it's not for you. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing
/archives//html/Amps/2013-02/msg00251.html (9,662 bytes)

47. [Amps] 813 efficiency (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:50:12 -0800
REPLY: Agreed, that won't happen anytime soon, but all those requirements don't have to happen for silicon to take over everywhere outside of certain areas of New Hampshire. Check the specs for the I
/archives//html/Amps/2013-02/msg00252.html (8,335 bytes)

48. Re: [Amps] 813 efficiency (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:21:54 -0600
Maybe in the monied qrm-tester dx-chaser plug and play ham radio world but not everywhere. Not everyone is raptured by here-today gone-tomorrow FETs and future unobtainium microchip control circuitry
/archives//html/Amps/2013-03/msg00000.html (7,777 bytes)

49. Re: [Amps] 813 efficiency (score: 1)
Author: Paul Baldock <paul@paulbaldock.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:38:30 -0800
Checkout the Expert 2K. Full legal limit even on 6M. A piece of beauty to behold. http://www.expertampsusa.com/ExpertAmps2K.pdf - Paul KW7Y Check the specs for the Icom IC-PW1: 1 kW 100% duty cycle o
/archives//html/Amps/2013-03/msg00002.html (8,551 bytes)

50. Re: [Amps] 813 efficiency (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 17:12:05 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:50:12 -0800, you Jim : REPLY: No, it's not new, been around for years. Check the Icom website. Full model number is IC-PW1. It does have one minor problem whi
/archives//html/Amps/2013-03/msg00003.html (7,599 bytes)

51. Re: [Amps] 813 efficiency (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 22:05:51 -0500
So not a peep about IMD or drive power required for 1000W on various bands. How much Pout overhead is there? REPLY: Takes 100 watts for 1 kW output, IMD meets FCC specs. It's a 1 kW amp, if you want
/archives//html/Amps/2013-03/msg00008.html (8,889 bytes)

52. Re: [Amps] 813 efficiency (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 13:48:20 -0500
Interesting in that they list even less specs than the Icom. Carl KM1H Checkout the Expert 2K. Full legal limit even on 6M. A piece of beauty to behold. http://www.expertampsusa.com/ExpertAmps2K.pdf
/archives//html/Amps/2013-03/msg00018.html (9,604 bytes)

53. Re: [Amps] 813 efficiency (score: 1)
Author: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 12:04:58 -0700
Which specs would you have them include ? 73, Dick, W1KSZ _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2013-03/msg00019.html (10,909 bytes)

54. Re: [Amps] 813 efficiency (score: 1)
Author: peter chadwick <g8on@fsmail.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 21:42:12 +0100
Graphs of efficency v. output power with frequency as a parameter. Graphs of IMD v output power with frequency as a parameter. Graphs of harmonic level v. output power with frequency as a parameter.
/archives//html/Amps/2013-03/msg00021.html (7,699 bytes)

55. Re: [Amps] 813 efficiency (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 16:56:26 -0500
I dont know if he can handle all that Peter(-; Add graphs of efficiency and IMD at various drive levels with frequency as a parameter Carl Graphs of efficency v. output power with frequency as a para
/archives//html/Amps/2013-03/msg00022.html (8,823 bytes)

56. Re: [Amps] 813 efficiency (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 14:03:11 -0800
REPLY: If I'm reading the specs right, it's not full legal limit for RTTY. Automatically de rates itself to the MID position, 1000 watts. If you are a RTTY'er you can get 1000 w 100% duty cycle from
/archives//html/Amps/2013-03/msg00023.html (8,143 bytes)

57. Re: [Amps] 813 efficiency (score: 1)
Author: Paul Baldock <paul@paulbaldock.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 14:56:56 -0800
Sorry, my brain automatically filters out anything that requires typing. Given that, you may wonder how I'm replying here..... - Paul REPLY: If I'm reading the specs right, it's not full legal limit
/archives//html/Amps/2013-03/msg00026.html (8,794 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 57
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu