Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+87A\s+vs\.\s+IC\-PW1\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:03:57 -0500
"A refresher course in logic", I would say that might be in order here. QSK can be done on SSB as well as CW although no one that I know is set up to do so, but it can be done between syllables of s
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00412.html (10,353 bytes)

22. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: Joe Isabella <n3ji@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:16:52 -0800 (PST)
That's a pretty grim outlook.......but more and more, my estimates have gotten worse, too. Damn shame... Joe, N3JI The best hams are 1) courteous and 2) have good listening skills. Between those two
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00420.html (8,518 bytes)

23. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:21:48 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Well then the guy who asked the original question should go for the soLID state amplifier. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _____________________
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00423.html (9,594 bytes)

24. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:18:10 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Pretty bold statement there, Jim. Are you sure you want to call half the CW ops in the world lids? 73, Bill W6WRT _________________
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00424.html (8,240 bytes)

25. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: PA3DUV <pa3duv@planet.nl>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:01:05 +0100
Dave, I'd vote for the model with max Pout. After all that's where a HF power amp is made for. The 87 has a 3 dB advantage over the PW1. In that respect it might be a good idea not to limit your choi
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00460.html (10,641 bytes)

26. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Burr" <dtburr@speakeasy.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:31:10 -0600
Dick: Yes, I owned an Emtron DX-2sp and liked it quite a bit. Maybe the thing to do is sell the PW1 and then when it is time to replace the 91B I will look at the DX4, especially because the Alpha pr
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00462.html (12,449 bytes)

27. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:39:24 -0600
Is the DX4 auto-tune like the 87A and PW1? Comparable in price? Legal in USA? 73, Keith NM5G Dave, I'd vote for the model with max Pout. After all that's where a HF power amp is made for. The 87 has
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00464.html (11,505 bytes)

28. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: PA3DUV <pa3duv@planet.nl>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:46:23 +0100
No, it's manual tune. 9 position band switch, no aux positions. Due to the 2 paralled GU84B tetrode tubes and the resulting low impedance the tuning is virtually single knob (load) + band switch. No
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00467.html (13,025 bytes)

29. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: "peter.voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 23:37:41 +0100
With the Bugatti Veyron you may go faster then 400km/h if you like, but with your linear you are limited to 750W PEP in Germany 73 Peter No idea if it's legal in the USA and its Territories. I know t
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00469.html (9,148 bytes)

30. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:54:17 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Same guy that designed the TS-2000? :-) 73, Bill W6WRT ex-Kenwood fan _______________________________________________ Amps mailing
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00478.html (8,780 bytes)

31. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 21:06:06 -0600
To each his own. I happen to like the way mine looks and works, and I like the fact that I have one of the 20 that were produced. http://www.dutson.net/Ham/IMG_0840ds.JPG http://www.dutson.net/Ham/I
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00480.html (9,726 bytes)

32. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 19:17:59 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Looks good to me too. Any reason why only 20 were produced? 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mai
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00481.html (9,351 bytes)

33. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 21:41:22 -0600
Last year I decided to expand my station to multi-2. In 1995 I ordered an 87A at the Dallas Hamcom and had to wait 6 months for delivery. It seemed like a good idea to get a second unit for the new c
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00482.html (9,772 bytes)

34. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Burr" <dtburr@speakeasy.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:58:59 -0600
No, I think the guy that designed the Chevy Impala is the one the designed the TS-2000. Or maybe it was the guy that designed the Pontiac Aztek. -- Original Message -- From: Bill Turner To: Dave Burr
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00491.html (9,174 bytes)

35. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Burr" <dtburr@speakeasy.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:00:46 -0600
_______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00492.html (10,902 bytes)

36. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:04:11 -0600
Yes. Here is a photo of the 9000. http://www.dutson.net/Ham/IMG_0823d.JPG It has the blue display. 73, Keith NM5G _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00502.html (11,599 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 36
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu