Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+8877\s+failures\s+and\s+GE\s+Medical\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+8877\s+failures\s+and\s+GE\s+Medical\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] 8877 failures and GE Medical (score: 1): Author: w8ji at contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun Mar 2 19:06:02 2003; Rich made an incorrect statement that ETO was to blame for 8877 failures. The 8877 failures with GE medical were well known to be a manufacturing problem with the tubes. Eimac fought that problem for; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00033.html (8,025 bytes)
2. [Amps] 8877 failures and GE Medical (score: 1): Author: 2 at vc.net (2); Date: Sun Mar 2 19:30:15 2003; GE Medical cancelled the contract years after Eimac fixed the heat dam problem. - R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00034.html (8,527 bytes)
3. [Amps] 8877 failures and GE Medical (score: 1): Author: peter.chadwick at Zarlink.Com (peter.chadwick@Zarlink.Com); Date: Tue Mar 4 03:49:27 2003; manufacturing would know. Even small >receiving tubes operating in low-voltage systems were the most likely components to fail in old tube I suspect one problem is that a lot of manufacturing 'know h; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00087.html (7,917 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]