Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+A\s+few\s+nice\s+ones\s+on\s+Ebay\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] A few nice ones on Ebay (score: 1)
Author: Donald Fox <taurusshoguy@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 19:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
Gentlemen: It would be nice to think that we might hold ourselves to a littler higher standard such that we can appreciate where some of us came from. I am not ashamed to admit that CB was my gateway
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00338.html (7,639 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] A few nice ones on Ebay (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Carter <amps@hidden-valley.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 23:14:45 -0400
Respectfully, I must point out that your analogy breaks down at the point where it isn't illegal to stuff a Hemi into a Mini. I seem to recall a time when 11m was limited to 4 Watts. The FCC used to
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00339.html (7,786 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] A few nice ones on Ebay (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 00:02:43 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: An illegal mono band amp. Are you proud of that? 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00340.html (6,951 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] A few nice ones on Ebay (score: 1)
Author: Patrick <tpblogeditor@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:22:00 -0400
Gentleman, I started this thread as a fun thread to look at some Amp pictures and for a little fun, I tossed in a e-bay listing on a CB amp. That started a discussion on old Tube Type CB amps. I DID
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00342.html (7,519 bytes)

5. [Amps] A few nice ones on Ebay (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <Jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 01:57:17 -0700
Respectfully, I must point out that your analogy breaks down at the point where it isn't illegal to stuff a Hemi into a Mini. I seem to recall a time when 11m was limited to 4 Watts. The FCC used to
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00344.html (8,216 bytes)

6. [Amps] A few nice ones on Ebay (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <Jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 02:25:13 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: An illegal mono band amp. Are you proud of that? 73, Bill W6WRT amp.. that just happens to work on 11m... and got into the wrong hands. Just be glad they are not running ramp
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00345.html (8,429 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] A few nice ones on Ebay (score: 1)
Author: DAVE WHITE <mausoptik@btinternet.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 10:13:40 +0000 (GMT)
".. the 12-10m  portion of the spectrum  is a complete right (sic) off." Well at least someone's using it.  That way the government can't sell it off to their crooked friends. Who knows, some of thos
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00346.html (9,885 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] A few nice ones on Ebay (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:10:46 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Have the rules changed? Such a transceiver used to be illegal, i.e. not type-accepted. Has the ARRL "endorsed" an illegal transceiver? Details, please. 73, Bill W6WRT _______
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00347.html (8,135 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] A few nice ones on Ebay (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:14:01 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Not if they bring their rules-be-damned attitude and their stupid Smokey Bear lingo. 10-4 good buddy? 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mail
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00348.html (8,242 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] A few nice ones on Ebay (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 09:51:22 -0400
Its also illegal to take your big bucks 300-600 HP car for a spin at 120+ mph but many do it that are unqualified to be driving out of a parking lot. In fact probably a lot more than illegal CBers w
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00349.html (8,795 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] A few nice ones on Ebay (score: 1)
Author: Gary McAdams <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 08:51:40 -0700
Hello, all... Yeah, we've been hearing these arguments for years, as if "technical ability" trumps legality. So what if the "freebanders" are technically competent? The first thing that they use thei
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00352.html (9,890 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] A few nice ones on Ebay (score: 1)
Author: James Colville <jimw7ry@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 09:15:49 -0700
*"It is not too distant a time where the "first personal" 10-4, etc crap will be considered normal..."* None of that CRAP on CW or RTTY! First personal! How much sense does that make? It's not even p
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00353.html (11,390 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] A few nice ones on Ebay (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:46:40 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: My goodness! What a negatory attitude! :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00357.html (8,558 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] A few nice ones on Ebay (score: 1)
Author: Donald Fox <taurusshoguy@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 18:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
G The point I wanted to make is that hopefully we don't end up sounding like those folks on 80 meters running megawatt stations that will only talk to you if you are in their "clique." I would be qui
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00363.html (9,000 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] A few nice ones on Ebay (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 20:00:10 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: First of all, nobody runs megawatt stations on 80 or any other band. If you want an intelligent conversation, don't exaggerate. Second, if they want to talk to their own cliq
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00364.html (9,429 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] A few nice ones on Ebay (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 23:17:27 -0400
First time I ever heard any one defend what goes on, on 75 <:-)) How much power they run? I have no idea, but it's not QRP. Find "their frequency" quiet. Call CQ<:-)) Listen for a while. They often m
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00365.html (9,965 bytes)

17. [Amps] A few nice ones on Ebay (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <Jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 05:38:53 -0700
REPLY: Have the rules changed? Such a transceiver used to be illegal, i.e. not type-accepted. Has the ARRL "endorsed" an illegal transceiver? Details, please. 73, Bill W6WRT back in the arrl lab /qst
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00370.html (9,207 bytes)

18. Re: [Amps] A few nice ones on Ebay (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 09:54:13 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Ok, I guess that's how it snuck under the FCC wire. Thanks. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00379.html (8,369 bytes)

19. Re: [Amps] A few nice ones on Ebay (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:47:33 -0400
There were several incarnations of the MLA2500 that didn't even require cutting a wire, but did take a wrench. 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@c
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00391.html (8,817 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu