Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+AC\s+circuit\s+analysis\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+AC\s+circuit\s+analysis\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] AC circuit analysis (score: 1): Author: emailw8nf at yahoo.com (Dave Haupt); Date: Mon Mar 17 02:27:52 2003; today, was valid before I was born, and will be valid long after I am outta here.<< That would be a good assumption to re-think. "AC circuit-analysis" (by this, I assume you are referring to sinusoi; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00616.html (9,187 bytes)
2. [Amps] AC circuit analysis (score: 1): Author: 2 at vc.net (rlm); Date: Mon Mar 17 05:25:19 2003; ** agreed. However, Newtonian physics works fairly ok below 99% of the speed of light. Valid points, Dave, however for analyzin' 100MHz or so L/R parasitic-oscillation suppression, the albeit archai; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00618.html (10,004 bytes)
3. [Amps] AC circuit analysis (score: 1): Author: RFlabnotes at aol.com (RFlabnotes@aol.com); Date: Mon Mar 17 11:53:54 2003; Dave: Your assumption that we all assume steady-state,sinusoidal variables in AC circuits is simply not true, and I don't see why you bothered to launch the tirade about it. Those of us who do circui; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00638.html (7,604 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]