Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+AL\-82\s+vs\s+Henry\s+2k\s+X\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+AL\-82\s+vs\s+Henry\s+2k\s+X\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] AL-82 vs Henry 2k X (score: 1): Author: "Sam Carpenter" <sam@owenscommunication.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:09:48 -0500; Hello all. I am looking for some input. I love the Henry PS and most of the amp. I have had some custom built Henry Amps and an ss750. I loved them all. Now I will be needing something for home. Rati; /archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00728.html (7,060 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] AL-82 vs Henry 2k X (score: 1): Author: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 06:33:02 +0800; G'day Sam My answer would be to open up an AL-82 and look very carefully at the construction, the layout, the parts used, etc, etc. I don't know what the 82 is like in this regard but if it is like t; /archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00730.html (9,230 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] AL-82 vs Henry 2k X (score: 1): Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:59:49 -0800; Hi, I just got an AL-82, used to have an SB-220. I like the 82 much better. Looks to be built fine, and I have run it at 900 W RTTY in contesting mode, lots of little short transmissions... So far th; /archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00732.html (8,751 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]