Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+ALS\-600\s+vs\s+ALS\-1300\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+ALS\-600\s+vs\s+ALS\-1300\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] ALS-600 vs ALS-1300 (score: 1): Author: John K0CQW <k0cqwgroups@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 08:57:19 -0500; Looking for info on these SS amps. ALS-600 vs ALS-1300. A ham ask me what one to buy ? I have no experience on SS amps. I did tell him not much difference in S units between the 600 vs 1200 w . Any t; /archives//html/Amps/2014-04/msg00119.html (7,124 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] ALS-600 vs ALS-1300 (score: 1): Author: "qrv@kd4e.com" <qrv@kd4e.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:09:50 -0400; John, There is a discernible received advantage between 600w output & 1300w output but I'd focus rather on overhead. If money is no object when he runs the 1300 soft it should last forever, whereas i; /archives//html/Amps/2014-04/msg00120.html (8,232 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] ALS-600 vs ALS-1300 (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 07:30:00 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: Most of the time the above is correct, but every long time DXer will tell you about the rare one that got away because he (the DX) just could not quite copy; /archives//html/Amps/2014-04/msg00121.html (7,281 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] ALS-600 vs ALS-1300 (score: 1): Author: Vic Rosenthal K2VCO <k2vco.vic@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 09:30:20 -0700; First, I agree with W6WRT. For DXing, especially on 80/160m, you should have a legal limit amplifier. If you want to operate RTTY or AM, you also want one that can do it for a long period of time wit; /archives//html/Amps/2014-04/msg00122.html (9,941 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] ALS-600 vs ALS-1300 (score: 1): Author: peter chadwick <g8on@fsmail.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 18:45:56 +0200; The comments on eham.net in the Amplifiers Forum seem to suggest that the lack of reliability in ALS1300 lies in the power supply, which. There was a suggestion that the ALS1300 is two ALS-600s with; /archives//html/Amps/2014-04/msg00123.html (7,639 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] ALS-600 vs ALS-1300 (score: 1): Author: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 09:56:31 -0700; You omitted the AL-1200 with 53 reviews and a rating of 4.9. Sure the tube is expensive, but they also a long time (mine is going on 20 years old and still good). They also sell for ludicrous prices; /archives//html/Amps/2014-04/msg00124.html (8,002 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] ALS-600 vs ALS-1300 (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stover <kevin.stover@mediacombb.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:06:52 -0500; You are correct. The problem was with the 12V supply, not the 50V supply. Those problems have been eliminated for the most part. The 1300 suffered from a lot of growing pains and bad reviews, thus th; /archives//html/Amps/2014-04/msg00125.html (8,092 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] ALS-600 vs ALS-1300 (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:22:00 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: Certainly true, and the "fools" label applies to both designers and users. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list A; /archives//html/Amps/2014-04/msg00128.html (7,792 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] ALS-600 vs ALS-1300 (score: 1): Author: donroden@hiwaay.net; Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:49:14 -0500; What about the Expert 2K-FA ? I could sell all my tube amps, and pick up some room in the shack. Don W4DNR _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http:/; /archives//html/Amps/2014-04/msg00129.html (7,616 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] ALS-600 vs ALS-1300 (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:17:32 -0400; Too bad the Tokyo Hy Power amps are no longer made. They were good looking, well made, good performing amps burning up. DXing, contesting, or satisfaction, that extra 3db sometimes makes a a big diff; /archives//html/Amps/2014-04/msg00130.html (11,220 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] ALS-600 vs ALS-1300 (score: 1): Author: BILL ENGLISH <bill@k4fx.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 02:29:41 -0400; I agree with WRT, if you are into serious DXing, go for the gusto and get legal limit, if you don't you will regret it the first time a big one gets away. Legal limit can be expensive if you must go; /archives//html/Amps/2014-04/msg00131.html (12,688 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] ALS-600 vs ALS-1300 (score: 1): Author: "qrv@kd4e.com" <qrv@kd4e.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 09:37:42 -0400; Amazing amp & excellent support. What about the Expert 2K-FA ? I could sell all my tube amps, and pick up some room in the shack. Don W4DNR -- David (NOT Dave) Colburn, KD4E - Nevils, Georgia USA Saf; /archives//html/Amps/2014-04/msg00132.html (8,656 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] ALS-600 vs ALS-1300 (score: 1): Author: Roger <roger@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:13:12 -0400; Too bad the Tokyo Hy Power amps are no longer made. They were good looking, well made, good performing amps First, I agree with W6WRT. For DXing, especially on 80/160m, you should have a legal limit; /archives//html/Amps/2014-04/msg00135.html (11,921 bytes)
14. Re: [Amps] ALS-600 vs ALS-1300 (score: 1): Author: Roger <roger@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 19:59:51 -0400; REPLY: Certainly true, and the "fools" label applies to both designers and users. Do the 600s work well? If so, there is nothing wrong with using a pair of them with dividers and combiners. It's a ve; /archives//html/Amps/2014-04/msg00146.html (9,970 bytes)
15. Re: [Amps] ALS-600 vs ALS-1300 (score: 1): Author: Don Allen <w9cw@w9cw.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 19:21:51 -0500; One thought on the ALS-600... I've known Martin Jue for a long time, as he and I worked at the same defense industry plant in 1967 - 1968 time frame (Magnavox Government and Industrial Division). He; /archives//html/Amps/2014-04/msg00157.html (11,448 bytes)
16. Re: [Amps] ALS-600 vs ALS-1300 (score: 1): Author: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 17:33:04 -0700; Next time you chat with him, suggest they add 6 Meters to those Amps. He will have a winner. 73, Dick, W1KSZ _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http; /archives//html/Amps/2014-04/msg00158.html (11,962 bytes)
17. Re: [Amps] ALS-600 vs ALS-1300 (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stover <kevin.stover@mediacombb.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 07:53:31 -0500; The 600's do work well. The MRF-150 is a tried and true FET. The only problem anybody ever complained about on the 1300 was the low voltage (12V) power supply. It had a ridiculous failure rate for ab; /archives//html/Amps/2014-04/msg00160.html (9,807 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]