Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Alpha\s+77DX\s*$/: 55 ]

Total 55 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1)
Author: "k7rdx" <k7rdx@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 08:52:06 -0700
Does anyone know what a clean 77dx (2 tube)is worth on todays market? Replys off list pse...Thanks,Jim,K7RDX.. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com ht
/archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00040.html (6,141 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 11:15:42 -0600
Why reply off the list? Is this some proprietary information? Doug Does anyone know what a clean 77dx (2 tube)is worth on today's market? Replys off list pse...Thanks,Jim,K7RDX.. ____________________
/archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00041.html (7,234 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1)
Author: "Harold Mandel" <hmandel@barantelecom.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:40:12 -0400
Jim, The two-tube '77 sometimes says "77Dx" on the beige front panel, but is a "77Sx" machine. There were several editions of '77's: Very, very few 2-tube '77's were made by the ETO factory. These ar
/archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00042.html (7,724 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1)
Author: "Phil Clements" <philc@texascellnet.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:09:14 -0500
There are 3 kinds of 2-tube 77 amps that I can think of off the top of my head: 1. 77SX, produced by the factory as such. 2. 77DX, converted with a kit sold by Alpha to dealers or pro technicians. So
/archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00043.html (9,141 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1)
Author: Theo Bellamy <theo.bellamy@spirittelecom.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:25:52 -0400
Funny how much expense and work folks will endure for 3 db! Theo K4MO _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf
/archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00044.html (7,887 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1)
Author: "Phil Clements" <philc@texascellnet.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:33:13 -0500
Funny how much expense and work folks will endure for 3 db! Theo K4MO During the 77DX/SX era, 100% 8877 MRI pulls were very reasonably priced, and readily available. Even the entire kit with a new Ei
/archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00045.html (7,812 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1)
Author: Colin Lamb <k7fm@teleport.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:38:11 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
"Funny how much expense and work folks will endure for 3 db!" It may not have anything to do with 3 db. I am restoring a factory 77SX for myself. I even have the black panel for it. I never ever run
/archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00046.html (8,449 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:49:07 -0400
I never could understand the fascination with running a par of 8877s, except for the bragging rights. My single-tube 77Dx is already capable of far more output power than authorized by U.S. regulati
/archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00047.html (7,847 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:59:24 -0400
Of course they also have to stack a 2nd antenna to get that full S unit wiggle on the meter at the other end. Somehow Ive never quite believed the "But I only run the legal limit" wail from owners of
/archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00048.html (9,279 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1)
Author: bob finger <finger@goeaston.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:13:10 -0400
Paul: Surely you remember the California Kw days? Me thinks they have not left us. When was the last time someone was cited by the FCC for excess power, or even visited after FS readings taken? For s
/archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00050.html (8,860 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1)
Author: Theo Bellamy <theo.bellamy@spirittelecom.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:15:40 -0400
OK ... I can identify with that! I spent an extra forty hours minimum doing metal work on my homebrew 4X5 so that the meters were behind smoked glass! 73 - Theo K4MO _________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00051.html (8,065 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1)
Author: "k7rdx" <k7rdx@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:03:25 -0700
Hell of a response guys....I am amazed! Have at it:Ebay#290236449389...A few of you guys say 6-8k for a nice one...I have to admit having spent about 800 building my single 8877 and (Blush) around 5k
/archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00052.html (9,202 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1)
Author: "Harold Mandel" <hmandel@barantelecom.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 16:38:19 -0400
Ebay#290236449389... Awww, gee whiz. I bet the seller is an OT who needs the dough for rent or gas. What a shame. You can tell it is his "honey." And three spare 8877's ! That alone is worth nearly $
/archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00053.html (8,193 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1)
Author: Verne Anderson <verne.anderson@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 07:54:08 -0700
To all, I have sent 2 messages thru eBay asking info about the amplifier and have not received a reply from the seller back thru eBay. A direct message looking like a typical eBay reply was sent from
/archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00063.html (9,893 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1)
Author: John Becker <johnb3030@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 11:55:46 -0500
Last year I was watching eBay for a Henry amplifier. I encountered several scam offerings of the Henry 5K, so this does go on. In addition, after purchasing a 3CX1200A7 tube on eBay, I received a co
/archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00065.html (8,833 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1)
Author: "Harold Mandel" <hmandel@barantelecom.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 13:02:50 -0400
The seller reputation is supposedly 100%, but the FOUR total transactions were over 90 days ago so they cannot be traced by a subscriber. Hal Mandel _______________________________________________ Am
/archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00066.html (8,229 bytes)

17. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Young" <paul@g0hwc.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 18:48:05 +0100
Hi all, I caught out a guy here in the UK as I found the photos he was using on the net!! So I send him a message asking for a close up photo of the meter and he could not do it. Paul G0HWC Check out
/archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00067.html (7,924 bytes)

18. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1)
Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 11:10:14 -0700
Current eBay policy forbids anyone to leave anything less than Positive feedback for any seller. Their "reputation" is, therefore, worthless. Dick -- Dick Flanagan K7VC NV SM dick@k7vc.com __________
/archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00068.html (8,638 bytes)

19. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1)
Author: Paul Whatton <paul@g4dcv.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 19:29:09 +0100
Other way round I thought? Or at least it is on this side of the pond. Sellers can't leave anything negative about a buyer even if they have really messed them around. From http://pages.ebay.co.uk/he
/archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00069.html (9,671 bytes)

20. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1)
Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 11:31:41 -0700
You are correct. I had it backwards. Sorry. Dick _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00070.html (10,272 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu