Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Alpha\s+77dx\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Alpha\s+77dx\s*$/: 55 ]

Total 55 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 15:08:13 -0400; Thats a bunch of crap. The buyer can still screw the seller 3 ways to Sunday with any level of FB. Its the seller that gets screwed by only being able to leave positive FB for the buyer. Carl KM1H __; /archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00071.html (9,211 bytes)
22. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1): Author: "Rich Hallman - N7TR" <rich@n7tr.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 12:58:05 -0700; I just got a reply from the guy since I was wondering about the amp being just a few miles from me. He is now in NY and not in Incline Village NV...He also said he would do $4000 Buy it now if I were; /archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00072.html (9,930 bytes)
23. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1): Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>; Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:04:40 -0700; I was wrong, Carl. Thanks for correcting me. Dick -- Dick Flanagan K7VC NV SM dick@k7vc.com _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesti; /archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00073.html (9,762 bytes)
24. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1): Author: "Fern Rivard" <crc@cyberlink.bc.ca>; Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 21:32:37 -0600; I've asked the seller to send me some digital photos of the interior of the amp but did NOT get any response. Fern I just got a reply from the guy since I was wondering about the amp being just a few; /archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00075.html (10,852 bytes)
25. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 08:12:02 -0400; I asked about doing an inspection as well as pickup if I won and got no answer. Maybe its time for somebody to create a bogus Ebay ID and "win" it. Carl KM1H _________________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00076.html (12,530 bytes)
26. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1): Author: Bob Bruno - K2KI <k2ki@starc.org>; Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 19:33:00 -0400; I too asked for additional photos plus some additional info on the amp. No response! When it looks like Bull$#!+, smells like Bull$#!+, it probably is Bull$#!+!!! GL to whomever wins it. I would like; /archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00077.html (14,231 bytes)
27. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1): Author: "k7rdx" <k7rdx@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 16:56:43 -0700; I think the listing disappeared...Check it out..I asked for an inspection too..No response...He probably got an offer he couldn`t refuse,pulled the ad and sold the amp off ebay to blitz the fees..I s; /archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00078.html (15,385 bytes)
28. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1): Author: AB2E Darrell <ab2e@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 20:05:41 -0400; Hi all, On Sunday, suddenly a whole bunch of bogus ads appeared, mostly copied ads (such as the QRO amp ad). All had a Buy It Now imbedded within the posting, which is your first clue it's bogus (sin; /archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00079.html (15,783 bytes)
29. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1): Author: RTTYMAN@aol.com; Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 20:13:04 EDT; Hello All: Yes ... the ad for the Alpha 77DX has disappeared. Before it went away, I was the high bidder. I investigated his name ... then used the FCC database to see if he was a licensed Ham. The r; /archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00080.html (8,479 bytes)
30. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1): Author: Bob Bruno - K2KI <k2ki@starc.org>; Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 20:21:07 -0400; Well, I do alot of eBay stuff and that message is a good sign that eBay pulled the auction. Maybe someone ratted him out. Damn, I wanted to be the one to do that!!! :-) In any event, some form of jus; /archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00081.html (17,205 bytes)
31. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 20:22:34 -0400; Ebay policy has absolutely no control over anything that is not sent thru the Ebay system. Anyway a buyer can not get anything but a positive FB these days. Carl KM1H ________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00082.html (9,364 bytes)
32. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1): Author: "k7rdx" <k7rdx@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:01:55 -0700; Ebay is trying to get more truthful buyer feedback by not allowing the seller to give retailatory feedback after the buyer gives a negitive. There will always be a few scammers&cheaters in the system; /archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00083.html (11,245 bytes)
33. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1): Author: "W7RY" <w7ry@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:14:23 -0700; Ebay pulled the auction. I was watching the auction and now it's gone. If the member ended the auction early, it would still be visible in my watched items. I just received a notice when I logged int; /archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00084.html (11,450 bytes)
34. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 22:34:41 -0400; Carl & All: I was NOT the buyer ... I was the "high bidder" when the ad was pulled from/by Ebay. From past experiences, eBay "normally" lets the ad run and adds a comment "the auction has ended." Thi; /archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00085.html (8,864 bytes)
35. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1): Author: Paul Whatton <paul@g4dcv.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 07:46:46 +0100; It sounds like it was a copied or spoof auction to me. A fraudster rips the text and photographs of a high value item from a genuine auction and then pastes them in to create an auction for something; /archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00086.html (10,374 bytes)
36. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:19:34 -0400; Which means there's no way I'd sell my 2002A through them. Of course our Midland MI swap is this Saturday and I'd not take the 2002A there either. I'm thinking of backing away from the VHF/UHF stuff; /archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00087.html (8,533 bytes)
37. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:34:21 -0400; I received a notice, but when I went to read it there was nothing there and it said, "no new mail". There was an "opt out", "revert to old system" and some other choice. I have no idea as to what the; /archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00089.html (13,563 bytes)
38. Re: [Amps] Alpha 77dx (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:37:41 -0400; Every one has to start some where and I refuse to use PayPay. They want too much information when my credit card should work just as well without some one else taking a bite. My credit cards offer al; /archives//html/Amps/2008-06/msg00090.html (11,867 bytes)
39. [Amps] Alpha 77DX (score: 1): Author: <sabrams@nycap.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:55:19 -0500; I recently got an Alpha 77DX that was factory refurbished, and would like to know the working parameters that other users are observing. The 77DX has the hypersil 4.4kV transformer (not a PeterDahl).; /archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00116.html (6,777 bytes)
40. [Amps] Alpha 77Dx (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:21:20 -0500; I had an unusual condition today that seems to be the prelude of my Alpha 77Dx's 8877 going bad. Shortly after applying AC power (about 20 sec.), the HV was reduced from what is normally 2600VDC duri; /archives//html/Amps/2009-01/msg00215.html (7,956 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]