Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Alpha\s+87A\s+Tubes\s+3CX800A7\s+and\s+the\s+3CX\s+P\s+800A7\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Alpha\s+87A\s+Tubes\s+3CX800A7\s+and\s+the\s+3CX\s+P\s+800A7\s+\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Alpha 87A Tubes 3CX800A7 and the 3CX P 800A7 ? (score: 1): Author: "DC" <daclark56@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:41:08 -0500; Is the 3CX P 800A7 interchangable with the 3CX800A7? _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2007-12/msg00274.html (6,969 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Alpha 87A Tubes 3CX800A7 and the 3CX P 800A7 ? (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:20:12 -0500; All varieties can be considered the same tube for ham use. Also any Eimac tube beginning with a Y is automatically 40-100% more expensive than its regular production brethren. Carl KM1H _____________; /archives//html/Amps/2007-12/msg00275.html (8,432 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Alpha 87A Tubes 3CX800A7 and the 3CX P 800A7 ? (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hewitt" <wd7s@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:44:53 -0800; Yes and no. The CPX version is rated for a higher plate voltage than the CX version with the Eimac tube. The CPX tube has a taller ceramic insulating portion at the base. The Svetlana CPX and CX vers; /archives//html/Amps/2007-12/msg00276.html (8,634 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]