Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Alpha\s+releases\s+New\s+Amp\s+9500\s*$/: 47 ]

Total 47 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] Alpha releases New Amp 9500 (score: 1)
Author: Karl-Arne Markstr&ouml;m <sm0aom@telia.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 08:44:37 +0200
Hm... If the RS-232 standard has been around more than 50 years, it then would predate transistorised logic circuits. The most common computer serial communications standard well into the 60's was th
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00164.html (13,616 bytes)

22. Re: [Amps] Alpha releases New Amp 9500 (score: 1)
Author: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@eon.net.au>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 16:41:54 +0800
I would rather just play with the knobs on an amplifier. That's the whole point of having one. I can't think why I would want to hook a computer up to one. 73, Alek VK6APK http://www.qrz.com/vk6apk _
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00165.html (7,914 bytes)

23. Re: [Amps] Alpha releases New Amp 9500 (score: 1)
Author: David Kirkby <david.kirkby@onetel.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 12:16:48 +0100
Good point. I never thought of that. Perhaps, I don't know. The fact still remains RS-232 has been around a long time, and shows no immediate sign of disappearing. Another option, which might satisfy
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00166.html (8,756 bytes)

24. Re: [Amps] Alpha releases New Amp 9500 (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 05:26:07 -0700
Because it's a major challenge to keep high power RF out of computer circuitry? Because one enjoys troubleshooting? Because one knows more about computers than RF? Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00167.html (8,857 bytes)

25. Re: [Amps] Alpha releases New Amp 9500 (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 06:01:05 -0700
All this time I have been thinking the point was to make your signal stronger. Jim, AF6O _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00169.html (8,409 bytes)

26. Re: [Amps] Alpha releases New Amp 9500 (score: 1)
Author: John Adkins <w4kv@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 06:11:06 -0700 (PDT)
Actually, the point that I'm trying to make is that new technology should be new technology. I don't object to the amplifier having a serial port. I'm disappointed that it doesn't have a USB port. Or
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00170.html (9,069 bytes)

27. Re: [Amps] Alpha releases New Amp 9500 (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 06:42:49 -0700
Jim -- I own two Toyota Corollas, an 03 and an '05. One has a 4-speed automatic transmission and one has a 5-speed manual transmission. Each accelerates from 0 to 60mph in c. 9.8 seconds. However, I
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00172.html (9,436 bytes)

28. Re: [Amps] Alpha releases New Amp 9500 (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 07:01:24 -0700
Where I come from we use an amplifier to make a signal stronger and a car when we want to go somewhere. Jim, AF6O _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00173.html (8,563 bytes)

29. Re: [Amps] Alpha releases New Amp 9500 (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 08:04:43 -0700
However, 100w from a car in the driveway is far stronger than 100,000w at a distance. Also, a 100kw autotune amplifier is likely to make 0w at any time - especially during a contest. cheerz, Jim Rich
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00174.html (9,362 bytes)

30. Re: [Amps] Alpha releases New Amp 9500 (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 14:06:30 -0500
immediate sign of disappearing What, other than amateur radio equipment, can be purchased new today that uses RS-232 to connect to the PC? 73, Keith NM5G ____________________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00177.html (7,608 bytes)

31. Re: [Amps] Alpha releases New Amp 9500 (score: 1)
Author: David Kirkby <david.kirkby@onetel.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 22:23:54 +0100
Where do you want to start Keith? Here's a short list, ranging from the cheap (600 VA USP) to the expensive (cesium beam primary frequency standard). You will note most are products aimed at a profes
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00179.html (11,203 bytes)

32. Re: [Amps] Alpha releases New Amp 9500 (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 16:59:10 -0500
That is encouraging to see, David. Hopefully we will still have serial port accessories for quite a few more years. I just hope amateur radio product manufacturers convert to a more modern interface
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00181.html (12,248 bytes)

33. Re: [Amps] Alpha releases New Amp 9500 (score: 1)
Author: David Kirkby <david.kirkby@onetel.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 23:34:59 +0100
I am sure the ham radio market will switch to the more modern interfaces, and be quite happy to sell you another rig/amp or whatever when the "modern" interface becomes defunct. That sort of thing wo
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00182.html (9,021 bytes)

34. Re: [Amps] Alpha releases New Amp 9500 (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Coleman N2BC" <n2bc@stny.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 18:47:31 -0400
Take a peek at Agilent and Tektronix..... Yes, RS-232 and GPIB and wait for it USB. 73, Bill N2BC _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00183.html (10,164 bytes)

35. Re: [Amps] Alpha releases New Amp 9500 (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 17:49:55 -0500
The issue for me is speed, not legacy. RS-232 has become obsolete for amateur radio. Aleady my Orion requires way too much time to upgrade the software. What is your prediction for the date the USB i
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00184.html (9,507 bytes)

36. Re: [Amps] Alpha releases New Amp 9500 (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 19:05:34 -0400
Dave, You can buy a serial port adapter card for about $10-$15 bucks (maybe less now) if I recall. I have a few of them laying around here. The cards take a whole 5 minutes at the most to install if
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00186.html (10,641 bytes)

37. Re: [Amps] Alpha releases New Amp 9500 (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 20:11:23 -0400
Then how much speed do you need between your PC and the amplifier given the limited amount of data transfer anyway? -Paul, W9AC _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00187.html (8,439 bytes)

38. Re: [Amps] Alpha releases New Amp 9500 (score: 1)
Author: "Steven Grant, W4IIV" <stevengrant98@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 21:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
way I see it....... if you are willing to pay $5,000.00 for an amp, you can afford $500.00 for a new computer think about it. Steven W4IIV John Adkins <w4kv@yahoo.com> wrote: Actually, the point that
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00193.html (9,849 bytes)

39. Re: [Amps] Alpha releases New Amp 9500 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Sawyer" <w3slk@uplink.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 07:55:10 -0400
Amen, Alek! Mike(y) W3SLK -- Original Message -- From: "Alek Petkovic" <vk6apk@eon.net.au> To: <amps@contesting.com> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 4:41 AM Subject: Re: [Amps] Alpha releases New
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00195.html (8,955 bytes)

40. Re: [Amps] Alpha releases New Amp 9500 (score: 1)
Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 07:33:14 +0200
How long does it take? 73 SM2EKM _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00197.html (8,247 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu