Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Ameritron\s+AL\-1500\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Ameritron\s+AL\-1500\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Ameritron AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: w7ry@netzero.net (w7ry); Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 16:01:58 -0700; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_004E_01C00F76.F6D0A3C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello to the group. I h; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00408.html (9,064 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Ameritron AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 16:54:37 -0700; Jim -- I would like to purchase the defective tube. My plan is to remove the anode cooler, photograph the part of the tube that failed and post the photograph on my Web site. - Rich..., 805.386.3734; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00409.html (7,275 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Ameritron AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: w7ry@netzero.net (w7ry); Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 22:35:25 -0700; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0015_01C00FAD.EDCD7DC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well the amp is fixed.=; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00413.html (12,236 bytes)
4. [Amps] Ameritron AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: "Rick Nichols" <rickn@netdoor.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 12:11:22 -0500; Has anyone ever successfully added a second tube to an AL-1500? What changes would be needed to make the power supply sufficient? Rick KD5MGK _______________________________________________ Amps mail; /archives//html/Amps/2003-09/msg00051.html (6,144 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@medinaec.com>; Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 18:06:22 -0500; At 12:11 PM 9/5/2003 -0500, you wrote: Has anyone ever successfully added a second tube to an AL-1500? What changes would be needed to make the power supply sufficient? Rick KD5MGK Rick-- AL-1500 is; /archives//html/Amps/2003-09/msg00052.html (8,686 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: "Phil Clements" <philk5pc@tyler.net>; Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 19:54:33 -0500; It's not just the power supply, Rick. The tank components are far too small for much over 1500 watts intermittant service. About the only things really usable for a conversion are the existing tube a; /archives//html/Amps/2003-09/msg00053.html (7,885 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: rlm <r@somis.org>; Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 00:13:50 -0700; ? Rick -- The main problem is not the HV PS, it is that the AL-1500's tank L needs to be cut in half for 2A of anode-I instead of 1A. Also, the extant tank-L conductors are too small - even for 1, 88; /archives//html/Amps/2003-09/msg00054.html (7,399 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: Wt8r@aol.com; Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 10:20:33 EDT; Rick-- What does a General class operator intend to do with a modified amplifier that runs 4 KW+ input anyway? Judging from the callsign, my guess is that he intends to run it from a 120 VAC wall pl; /archives//html/Amps/2003-09/msg00058.html (7,788 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: rlm <r@somis.org>; Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 08:23:01 -0700; ** ... provided one adds a VHF parasitic suppressor to the anode circuit, adds a cooling fan for the tank and bandswitch, and removes the RF-actuated T/R bias switch.. ______________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2003-09/msg00059.html (7,600 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>; Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 07:51:55 -0700; Well, gosh. I guess people should only play with things they are completely knowledgeable about. Of course, one might ask HOW they are supposed to become knowledgable? I'm sure passing a 20-wpm code; /archives//html/Amps/2003-09/msg00065.html (8,430 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 23:52:41 -0700; Dave, have you listened to a CW DX pileup lately. As far as I can tell from listening to all the lid operators who don't even bother listening to the DX there is near ZERO correlation between CW prof; /archives//html/Amps/2003-09/msg00069.html (9,983 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@blomand.net>; Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 22:59:55 -0500; In a short answer NOPE! These amps are marginal in all aspects at the 1500 watt power level. To explain: the PSU is not capable of handling the extra current of a 2nd tube. It would require a new pla; /archives//html/Amps/2003-09/msg00070.html (10,427 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: Ron <w8ron@stratos.net>; Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 01:39:46 -0400; At 12:11 PM 9/5/2003 -0500, you wrote: Has anyone ever successfully added a second tube to an AL-1500? What changes would be needed to make the power supply sufficient? Rick KD5MGK Rick-- What does; /archives//html/Amps/2003-09/msg00071.html (9,673 bytes)
14. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: Wt8r@aol.com; Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:38:10 EDT; Extreme Bill ............ I privately I wrote the clueless tech general an e-mail detailing all of the reasons not to modify an AL-1500 with a second 8877. I cautioned him about killing himself since; /archives//html/Amps/2003-09/msg00072.html (9,366 bytes)
15. RE: [Amps] Ameritron AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: "Skram, Helge (MED)" <helge.skram@med.ge.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 15:35:09 +0200; In short I agree. It is not a good idea to put in a extra tube in any comercial amp. You would probably need so many parts, that it would be a better idea to homebrew a new amp. I have a nice one tub; /archives//html/Amps/2003-09/msg00077.html (12,386 bytes)
16. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: rlm <r@somis.org>; Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 19:34:59 -0700; ** N5PS was the first dude to "go postal". He killed 14. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2003-09/msg00078.html (11,365 bytes)
17. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: Wt8r@aol.com; Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:48:46 EDT; Extreme Bill ............ ?????? ?????? I privately I wrote the clueless tech general an e-mail detailing all of the reasons not to modify an AL-1500 with a second 8877. ?????? I cautioned him about; /archives//html/Amps/2003-09/msg00080.html (9,229 bytes)
18. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: rlm <r@somis.org>; Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 04:36:31 -0700; 'Tis best to steer well clear of adult Hams that live with their mother. cheerz, Mike _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com; /archives//html/Amps/2003-09/msg00084.html (12,714 bytes)
19. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: "Alan Gray" <agray@voicenet.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:34:34 -0400; Since this implies that WA4D had is license revoked, just for the record Mike did not have his license suspended or revoked; he did, however, agree to pay a $2000 fine for intentional interference. T; /archives//html/Amps/2003-09/msg00089.html (11,452 bytes)
20. [Amps] Ameritron AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: Shon Edwards <sre.1966@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:51:44 -0700; I'm a bit new to HF and am looking at getting an Ameritron AL-1500 amp for some high power. I am also going to get the Hy-Gain AV-18HT to help me punch out that power. I'm really interested in doing; /archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00443.html (8,144 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]