- 1. [Amps] Ameritron AL-572B (score: 1)
- Author: jsb@digistar.com
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:22:15 -0400 (EDT)
- I'm on the trail of getting an Ameritron AL-572B - new, from the HamStation. Just wondering if anyone had any recommendations against getting this amp. I have thought about the 3-500Z AL-80B but have
- /archives//html/Amps/2003-10/msg00195.html (7,054 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-572B (score: 1)
- Author: "Peter Frenning, OZ1PIF" <oz1pif@get2net.dk>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 09:28:34 +0200
- I'm partial against the 572b tube, had some very bad luck with two sets of Svetlana's. I finally converted my old FL2000B to use a single QB4/1100 instead. Although a tetrode, I run it as a triode wi
- /archives//html/Amps/2003-10/msg00199.html (8,701 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-572B (score: 1)
- Author: peter.chadwick@Zarlink.Com
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:25:39 +0100
- against it. I've not found them very fragile, but I have found them prone to VHF parasitics because they have very long grid leads, and as a result, by the time you've cured the parasitics, they're n
- /archives//html/Amps/2003-10/msg00207.html (8,009 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-572B (score: 1)
- Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 06:20:05 -0700
- ** Peter -- Svetlana 572Bs reportedly have more VHF gain than other brands. -- Tetrodes with both grids grounded have very little anode-cathode feedback-C, which should make them more stable than a
- /archives//html/Amps/2003-10/msg00208.html (9,906 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-572B (score: 1)
- Author: gdaught6@Stanford.edu
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:44:37 -0700
- < snip > Don't forget the 4x150a! A fellow at Eimac told me years ago that you could run them in the '250 applications, SO LONG AS YOU KEEP THEM COOL. Probably fine in G-G service, if you use the pro
- /archives//html/Amps/2003-10/msg00210.html (7,947 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu