Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Ameritron\s+AL\-811H\-\-\s+Again\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Ameritron\s+AL\-811H\-\-\s+Again\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-811H-- Again (score: 1): Author: "Jim Reid" <reidj021@hawaii.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:33:22 -1000; Here is the reply I rcv'd this morning from Tom Raush, W8JI, who designed the AL-811H for Ameritron. Some personal stuff at the opening, is deleted, and he did give permision for me to pass this info; /archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00389.html (10,998 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-811H-- Again (score: 1): Author: "Bob Maser" <bmaser@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 19:32:53 -0400; Bottom line, Ameritron is junk. Its big plus is that they are cheap. Aren't they owned by MFJ? _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.conte; /archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00393.html (13,256 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-811H-- Again (score: 1): Author: "Jim Reid" <reidj021@hawaii.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:49:56 -1000; Yes they are. And as Tom said, it was designed to be "cheap". But it works, and I only paid $50 for it from a very old amateur dropping out of the hobby. He probably would have just given it to me,; /archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00395.html (7,601 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-811H-- Again (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 20:00:49 -0400; Bob, I gotta say, the writer of that letter sounded like he was surely mad about something. When an amp is built cheap, it's cheap and no matter how much paint and flashing lights you add to the outs; /archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00396.html (16,078 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-811H-- Again (score: 1): Author: Vic K2VCO <vic@rakefet.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:09:14 -0700; It's not junk. It's not a bad design and most of the components are acceptable to good quality. It's likely to be more trouble-free (assuming that it has decent tubes in it) than many 'better' amplif; /archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00398.html (8,619 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-811H-- Again (score: 1): Author: "Bob Maser" <bmaser@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 20:11:46 -0400; I can appreciate the fact that some hams just do not have the money for an Alpha or Acom. Rather than buying Ameritron junk why not buy a used Drake L4B or a Tentec amp, or even an SB220/200. Even th; /archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00399.html (17,851 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-811H-- Again (score: 1): Author: "W5IOK" <w5iok@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 20:12:33 -0400; Well I for one think the Ameritron 811H is a very good amp, Ive had mine for over 3 1/2 years, bought used, used every day, and dollar for dollar it's a great amp. There are some of us that are on fi; /archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00400.html (9,371 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-811H-- Again (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 20:17:54 -0400; Bob, Gimme a Drake L4-B any day and I'm satisfied. The SB-220 is a good choice but you may have to re-work bad construction techniques as you never know who built it. Same as the rest of the Heath pr; /archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00401.html (19,495 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-811H-- Again (score: 1): Author: "Peter Chadwick" <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 07:15:04 +0100; At the end of the day, the 572B isn't that good a tube for HF. OK, it 'gets by', but its structure isn't that good. As far as I can determine, it first appeared in the early 1950's as a zero bias aud; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00001.html (7,710 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-811H-- Again (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 03:23:05 -0700; On Sep 30, 2005, at 2:33 PM, Jim Reid wrote: Here is the reply I rcv'd this morning from Tom Raush, W8JI, who designed the AL-811H for Ameritron. Some personal stuff at the opening, is deleted, and h; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00002.html (17,693 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-811H-- Again (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 03:39:56 -0700; In my survey of Alpha 87 and 88 owners, c. 40% had needed to return theirs to the factory hospital. Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org ____________________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00003.html (8,730 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-811H-- Again (score: 1): Author: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>; Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 07:56:53 -0700; "In my survey of Alpha 87 and 88 owners, c. 40% had needed to return theirs to the factory hospital" Note - attribution marks left out on purpose. Quotation marks used to indicate I was quoting someo; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00009.html (8,693 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-811H-- Again (score: 1): Author: "W1GOR" <W1GOR@Maine.RR.Com>; Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 15:39:20 -0400; This MUST be true... FOX network carried it...! ...Larry - W1GOR _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amp; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00016.html (9,816 bytes)
14. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-811H-- Again (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 17:51:24 -0700; Whenever I ran into an owner, I asked him or her the question. A number of years back when he was active on this discussion group, Dick Ehrhorn told me in an e-mail he had c. 150 3CX800A7s at the fac; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00026.html (10,143 bytes)
15. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-811H-- Again (score: 1): Author: "Jim Reid" <reidj021@hawaii.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 15:05:15 -1000; The conclusion of it all.......... Appears my old AL-811H is headed for the land fill out here. Power supply seems completely burned up. Let a lot of smoke our of it today when I powered it up with t; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00027.html (8,584 bytes)
16. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-811H-- Again (score: 1): Author: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>; Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 18:35:00 -0700; " This was c. the same time that I found out that General Electric Medical had cancelled a contract with Dick because he failed to fix the problem of sudden 8877 failures in a MRI amplifier that he w; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00028.html (8,555 bytes)
17. [Amps] Ameritron AL-811H-- Again (score: 1): Author: OTAKEBI@aol.com; Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 23:41:24 EDT; I do not think the power supply of the AL-811H can handle four 572's. This is why when you change from 811's you don't see that big of a power output jump in the AL-811H. The power supply is at the e; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00029.html (8,185 bytes)
18. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-811H-- Again (score: 1): Author: "Jim Reid" <reidj021@hawaii.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 18:15:30 -1000; Thank you to those who have offered to buy the remains. However, I now have two offers from guys out here in the Islands to attempt to repair the little guy! So, Monday night, someone will pick me up; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00030.html (8,992 bytes)
19. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-811H-- Again (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 05:52:37 -0700; True, but according to Dick, the (damned) heat dam problem lasted about 13 months, so it's an inadequate excuse. When G. E. said there was a design problem, Dick should have listened. Afterall, Fyler; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00035.html (10,345 bytes)
20. Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-811H-- Again (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 05:54:54 -0700; 4, 811As have the same emission as 4, 572Bs, so PS current would be the same. Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00036.html (9,481 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]