Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Ameritron\s+Amps\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Ameritron\s+Amps\s*$/: 102 ]

Total 102 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1): Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 22:42:12 +0100; The major effect of ripple current is internal heating, so it's pretty much all about temperature in the end. It's interesting to work out the max. allowed internal temp from 85 (or 105C) + Iripple^2; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01326.html (9,072 bytes)
22. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1): Author: "W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 15:10:07 -0700; The two amplifiers that you list as an alternative don't have 160 meters. What was that you were smoking? 73 Jim W7RY My, I seem to have tweaked a sensitive spot with all you ameritron lovers(not cap; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01327.html (10,563 bytes)
23. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1): Author: Gudguyham@aol.com; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:58:05 EDT; Rich, I wish I could but I'm strapped for cash. I just invested heavily in Nichrome-80 ribbon. Cheers, Ken W2DTC CHORTLE _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contest; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01334.html (7,801 bytes)
24. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:09:24 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- I'd beware of a company which does not know the difference between "affect" and "effect". Makes me wonder about their attention to detail. Bill, W6WRT ________; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01335.html (9,590 bytes)
25. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:15:13 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- You make it sound as if Joe Ham could slap an amplifier together over a weekend and live happily ever after. Nothing could be further from the truth. The desig; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01336.html (8,755 bytes)
26. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:18:36 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- We should like them for that? Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01337.html (8,908 bytes)
27. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 21:22:26 -0400; Heck Bill, They're Japanese, I'm just proud it's written in English. As politically correct as this country has become, its a wonder we get that much. /TT ____________________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01338.html (9,463 bytes)
28. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:37:38 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- "Attention to detail" would include having a native English speaker proofread. I stand by my comment. Bill, W6WRT _____________________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01341.html (9,671 bytes)
29. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 22:09:52 -0400; "Attention to detail" would include having a native English speaker proofread. I stand by my comment. Bill, W6WRT I'm just a "dirt road country boy", but I'm smart enough to know what they're talkin; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01343.html (9,747 bytes)
30. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1): Author: mike kendall <ke6cvh@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:15:42 -0700 (PDT); Tom, Thanks for the reply. On my pasted response from my buddy, he states they chose the lowest life (2,000) hours caps out of the line. Also, I think the quality has gone down since you left Ameritr; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01344.html (14,894 bytes)
31. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:19:12 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- As you will find out as you go through life, attention to detail comes down from the top and either does or does not pervade a company. Don't make too much of; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01345.html (10,032 bytes)
32. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 22:31:29 -0400; Yes, I've already been thru a good portion of it. And another lesson I've learned is change always starts from the bottom-- I've never asked for a "new deal" if I'm holding a Full House. Thats true--; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01347.html (10,199 bytes)
33. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1): Author: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:36:35 -0700; Boy, is that a mistake. Building something myself is a lot more expensive than going down to the store and buying it. To make the chassis look good, I buy hole punches. Then, I need a milling machin; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01348.html (9,588 bytes)
34. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 22:43:46 -0400; -- Original Message -- From: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net> John, About all the websites I've visited that were Japanese or Chinese have mis-spelled words where they try to translate to english.; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01349.html (9,928 bytes)
35. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 23:05:13 -0400; Mike, I'm not posting this to pick at you, but just to show how we can leap to very wrong conclusions that sound very authorative. If people were paying $50K per amplifer and using them with navy ge; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01350.html (13,868 bytes)
36. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:19:33 -0700; No doubt, Colin. You build your own amp because you want the learning experience and pride that goes along with homebrewing, not because you want to save a lot of money. Even if materials are a wash; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01352.html (9,245 bytes)
37. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 11:53:30 +0200 (CEST); the only ones still building amateur amplifiers with glass tubes.< Strictly speaking, Joe, I think you have to qualify that with 'in the US'. 73 Peter G3RZP __________________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01358.html (8,038 bytes)
38. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 12:35:24 +0200 (CEST); effect in Starkville< In factories with very high levels of QA and inspection, things still get changed in production. Sometimes QA know and agree but don't check with engineering. Even if they do, t; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01359.html (9,050 bytes)
39. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1): Author: Gudguyham@aol.com; Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 06:53:42 EDT; The only amplifier design influenced by Richard Measures sold a grand total somewhere around 50-100 amplifiers before going belly up, and during its life had just as many field failures from arcing a; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01361.html (8,168 bytes)
40. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 13:23:04 +0200 (CEST); in perfect English. < Oh, I agree entirely. But a lot of US companies would run into trouble if that idea was strictly applied, although admittedly, they do get it right in American! 73 Peter G3RZP _; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01364.html (7,950 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]