Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Amperex\s+3\-400z\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Amperex\s+3\-400z\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Amperex 3-400z (score: 1): Author: Merv Schweigert <k9fd@flex.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 08:36:59 -1000; I recently bought a pair of supposedly new Amperex 3-400z type tubes. Do these type require more drive than Eimacs? I have tried them and they seem to have about the same output but take more drive a; /archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00441.html (6,492 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Amperex 3-400z (score: 1): Author: R L <r@somis.org>; Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 08:53:53 -0700; Slightly less because the Mu is 190 instead of 130. Because of more Mu, less cathode-grid potential is needed to achieve the same anode current, and that takes fewer watts. The input Z of Amperex 3-4; /archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00000.html (6,957 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]